Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 3
3.0 Executing Process Group: Materials Processing216
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Materials Processing218
3.2 Change Request: Materials Processing220
3.3 Change Log: Materials Processing222
3.4 Decision Log: Materials Processing224
3.5 Quality Audit: Materials Processing226
3.6 Team Directory: Materials Processing229
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Materials Processing231
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Materials Processing233
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Materials Processing235
3.10 Issue Log: Materials Processing237
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Materials Processing239
4.1 Project Performance Report: Materials Processing241
4.2 Variance Analysis: Materials Processing243
4.3 Earned Value Status: Materials Processing245
4.4 Risk Audit: Materials Processing247
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Materials Processing249
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Materials Processing251
5.0 Closing Process Group: Materials Processing253
5.1 Procurement Audit: Materials Processing255
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Materials Processing257
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Materials Processing259
5.4 Lessons Learned: Materials Processing261
Index263
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
2. What are the expected benefits of Materials Processing to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
3. What are your needs in relation to Materials Processing skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
4. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Materials Processing delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
5. What would happen if Materials Processing weren’t done?
<--- Score
6. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
7. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
8. When a Materials Processing manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
9. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
10. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
11. What is the extent or complexity of the Materials Processing problem?
<--- Score
12. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
13. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Materials Processing?
<--- Score
14. What information do users need?
<--- Score
15. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
16. Will Materials Processing deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
17. Does your organization need more Materials Processing education?
<--- Score
18. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
19. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
20. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
21. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
22. Who should resolve the Materials Processing issues?
<--- Score
23. Do you need to avoid or amend any Materials Processing activities?
<--- Score
24. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
25. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Materials Processing leader?
<--- Score
26. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
27. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
28. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
29.