Fault Tolerant System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Fault Tolerant System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 6
20. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
21. Will a Fault tolerant system production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
22. Is obsolescence of EEE Parts Failure Modes Required To Build a Fault Tolerant System?
<--- Score
23. How can the value of Fault tolerant system be defined?
<--- Score
24. How did the Fault tolerant system manager receive input to the development of a Fault tolerant system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
25. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
26. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
27. What are the Fault tolerant system use cases?
<--- Score
28. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
29. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
30. What happens if Fault tolerant system’s scope changes?
<--- Score
31. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
32. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
33. What gets examined?
<--- Score
34. What is the definition of Fault tolerant system excellence?
<--- Score
35. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
36. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
37. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
38. What are the dependability requirements of fault tolerant system?
<--- Score
39. What is the context?
<--- Score
40. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Fault tolerant system results are met?
<--- Score
41. Is there a clear Fault tolerant system case definition?
<--- Score
42. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
43. Who are the Fault tolerant system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
44. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
45. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
46. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
47. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
48. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Fault tolerant system leverage and how?
<--- Score
49. How do you catch Fault tolerant system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
50. What would be the goal or target for a Fault tolerant system’s improvement team?
<--- Score
51. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
52. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Fault tolerant system?
<--- Score
53. Do you all define Fault tolerant system in the same way?
<--- Score
54. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
55. What is in scope?
<--- Score
56. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
57. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
58. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
59. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Fault tolerant system changes?
<--- Score
60. How do you think the partners involved in Fault tolerant system would have defined success?
<--- Score
61. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
62. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
63. Has a Fault tolerant system requirement not been met?