Score
64. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
66. How do you think the partners involved in Robotic control would have defined success?
<--- Score
67. How can the value of Robotic control be defined?
<--- Score
68. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
69. Are the Robotic control requirements testable?
<--- Score
70. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
71. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
72. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
73. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
74. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
75. Is there a critical path to deliver Robotic control results?
<--- Score
76. What are the Robotic control tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
77. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Robotic control work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
78. When is/was the Robotic control start date?
<--- Score
79. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
80. What would be the goal or target for a Robotic control’s improvement team?
<--- Score
81. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
82. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
83. Will team members perform Robotic control work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
84. What happens if Robotic control’s scope changes?
<--- Score
85. Who are the Robotic control improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
86. Is the Robotic control scope manageable?
<--- Score
87. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
88. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
89. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
90. What are the record-keeping requirements of Robotic control activities?
<--- Score
91. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
92. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
93. What is in scope?
<--- Score
94. Is the Robotic control scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
95. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
96. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather Robotic control requirements?
<--- Score
98. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
101. How would you define Robotic control leadership?
<--- Score
102. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
103. Is Robotic control required?
<--- Score
104. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Robotic control changes?
<--- Score
105. What are the core elements of the Robotic control business case?
<--- Score
106. Will team members regularly document their Robotic control work?
<--- Score
107. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
108. How do you catch Robotic control definition inconsistencies?
