73. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
74. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Environmental finance?
<--- Score
75. What Environmental finance coordination do you need?
<--- Score
76. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
77. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
78. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Environmental finance? In other words, what are the risks, if Environmental finance does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
79. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Environmental finance leader?
<--- Score
80. What are the Environmental finance resources needed?
<--- Score
81. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
82. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
83. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
84. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
85. Will Environmental finance deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
86. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
87. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
88. Does Environmental finance create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
89. How are the Environmental finance’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
90. When a Environmental finance manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
91. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
92. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Environmental finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are the Environmental finance requirements complete?
<--- Score
2. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental finance changes?
<--- Score
3. What is the scope of the Environmental finance effort?
<--- Score
4. Who is gathering Environmental finance information?
<--- Score
5. How do you manage unclear Environmental finance requirements?
<--- Score
6. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
7. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
8. What Environmental finance services do you require?
<--- Score
9. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
10. Who are the Environmental finance improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
11. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
12. What is the scope of the Environmental finance work?
<--- Score
13. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
14. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
15. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
16. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental finance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
17. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
18. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<---
