Score
63. Do you all define Environmental finance in the same way?
<--- Score
64. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. What system do you use for gathering Environmental finance information?
<--- Score
66. Is Environmental finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
68. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
71. Is Environmental finance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
72. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
73. How can the value of Environmental finance be defined?
<--- Score
74. Is the scope of Environmental finance defined?
<--- Score
75. What are the core elements of the Environmental finance business case?
<--- Score
76. What is the definition of Environmental finance excellence?
<--- Score
77. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
78. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
79. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
81. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
82. What was the context?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
85. How would you define Environmental finance leadership?
<--- Score
86. Is the Environmental finance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
87. How will the Environmental finance team and the group measure complete success of Environmental finance?
<--- Score
88. What Environmental finance requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
89. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
91. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental finance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
92. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
93. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
94. How did the Environmental finance manager receive input to the development of a Environmental finance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
95. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental finance brings?
<--- Score
96. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
97. What is the scope of Environmental finance?
<--- Score
98. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
99. When is/was the Environmental finance start date?
<--- Score
100. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
101. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
102. Has a Environmental finance requirement not been met?
<--- Score
103. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
104. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
105. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
106. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Environmental finance management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones,
