Score
101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
102. Is special All-source intelligence user knowledge required?
<--- Score
103. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
104. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected All-source intelligence results are met?
<--- Score
105. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
106. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
107. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
108. How are consistent All-source intelligence definitions important?
<--- Score
109. Do you have a All-source intelligence success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
110. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
111. Are accountability and ownership for All-source intelligence clearly defined?
<--- Score
112. Is there a clear All-source intelligence case definition?
<--- Score
113. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
114. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
115. Who is gathering All-source intelligence information?
<--- Score
116. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
117. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
118. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
119. Is All-source intelligence required?
<--- Score
120. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
121. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that All-source intelligence brings?
<--- Score
122. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
123. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
124. Is All-source intelligence currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
125. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
126. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
127. What system do you use for gathering All-source intelligence information?
<--- Score
128. Has the All-source intelligence work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
129. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
130. Has a All-source intelligence requirement not been met?
<--- Score
131. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
132. What are the All-source intelligence tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
133. What is the definition of All-source intelligence excellence?
<--- Score
134. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
135. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
136. How have you defined all All-source intelligence requirements first?
<--- Score
137. Who approved the All-source intelligence scope?
<--- Score
138. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
139. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
140. What is the scope of the All-source intelligence work?
<--- Score
141. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
