Plan: Agriculture Technology213
2.39 Change Management Plan: Agriculture Technology215
3.0 Executing Process Group: Agriculture Technology217
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Agriculture Technology219
3.2 Change Request: Agriculture Technology221
3.3 Change Log: Agriculture Technology223
3.4 Decision Log: Agriculture Technology225
3.5 Quality Audit: Agriculture Technology227
3.6 Team Directory: Agriculture Technology230
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Agriculture Technology232
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Agriculture Technology234
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Agriculture Technology236
3.10 Issue Log: Agriculture Technology238
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Agriculture Technology240
4.1 Project Performance Report: Agriculture Technology242
4.2 Variance Analysis: Agriculture Technology244
4.3 Earned Value Status: Agriculture Technology246
4.4 Risk Audit: Agriculture Technology248
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Agriculture Technology250
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Agriculture Technology252
5.0 Closing Process Group: Agriculture Technology254
5.1 Procurement Audit: Agriculture Technology256
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Agriculture Technology258
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Agriculture Technology260
5.4 Lessons Learned: Agriculture Technology262
Index264
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
2. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
3. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
4. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
5. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Agriculture technology? In other words, what are the risks, if Agriculture technology does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
6. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
7. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
8. Is it needed?
<--- Score
9. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
10. What vendors make products that address the Agriculture technology needs?
<--- Score
11. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
12. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
13. Consider your own Agriculture technology project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
14. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
15. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
16. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
17. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
18. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
19. What situation(s) led to this Agriculture technology Self Assessment?
<--- Score
20. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
21. How do you recognize an Agriculture technology objection?
<--- Score
22. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
23. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Agriculture technology research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
24. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
25. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
26. What are your needs in relation to Agriculture technology skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
27. What needs to be done?
