Learning Outcomes A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Learning Outcomes A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 5
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you catch Learning outcomes definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
2. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Learning outcomes leverage and how?
<--- Score
3. How do you hand over Learning outcomes context?
<--- Score
4. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
5. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
6. How do you gather Learning outcomes requirements?
<--- Score
7. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
8. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
9. What system do you use for gathering Learning outcomes information?
<--- Score
10. How do you think the partners involved in Learning outcomes would have defined success?
<--- Score
11. What was the context?
<--- Score
12. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
13. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
14. Who approved the Learning outcomes scope?
<--- Score
15. How did the Learning outcomes manager receive input to the development of a Learning outcomes improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
16. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
17. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
18. Is Learning outcomes currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
19. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
20. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
21. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
22. Is the Learning outcomes scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
23. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
24. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
26. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
27. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
29. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
30. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
31. Is there any additional Learning outcomes definition of success?
<--- Score
32. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
33. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
34. What are the core elements of the Learning outcomes business case?
<--- Score
35. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
36. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
37. Who are the Learning outcomes improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
38. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Learning outcomes? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
39. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
40. Has a Learning outcomes requirement not been met?
<--- Score
41. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
42. What sources do you use to gather information for a Learning outcomes study?