<--- Score
56. What sources do you use to gather information for a Wireless local area network study?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather Wireless local area network requirements?
<--- Score
58. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
59. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
60. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
61. Are improvement team members fully trained on Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
62. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
63. How do you hand over Wireless local area network context?
<--- Score
64. How does the Wireless local area network manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
65. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
66. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
67. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
68. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. Is the Wireless local area network scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
71. Who is gathering Wireless local area network information?
<--- Score
72. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
73. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
74. Will team members regularly document their Wireless local area network work?
<--- Score
75. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
76. Is there a critical path to deliver Wireless local area network results?
<--- Score
77. What Wireless local area network services do you require?
<--- Score
78. Is Wireless local area network currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. What is the definition of Wireless local area network excellence?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope?
<--- Score
81. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
82. What are the Wireless local area network tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
83. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
85. What would be the goal or target for a Wireless local area network’s improvement team?
<--- Score
86. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
87. What is the context?
<--- Score
88. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
89. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
90. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
91. Has the Wireless local area network work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
92. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
93. Is Wireless local area network linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
94. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
95. Are the Wireless local area network requirements testable?
<--- Score
96. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Wireless local area network? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
97. Have all basic functions of Wireless local area network been defined?
<--- Score
98. The political context: who holds power?
<---
