Team Member Status Report: Web Data Services217
3.2 Change Request: Web Data Services219
3.3 Change Log: Web Data Services221
3.4 Decision Log: Web Data Services223
3.5 Quality Audit: Web Data Services225
3.6 Team Directory: Web Data Services228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Web Data Services230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Web Data Services232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Web Data Services234
3.10 Issue Log: Web Data Services236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Web Data Services238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Web Data Services240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Web Data Services242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Web Data Services244
4.4 Risk Audit: Web Data Services246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Web Data Services248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Web Data Services250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Web Data Services252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Web Data Services254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Web Data Services256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Web Data Services258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Web Data Services260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
2. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Web data services as an effective investment?
<--- Score
3. Does Web data services create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
4. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
5. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
6. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
7. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
8. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
9. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
10. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
11. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
12. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
13. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Web data services?
<--- Score
14. Do you recognize Web data services achievements?
<--- Score
15. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
16. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
17. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
18. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
19. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
20. What is the Web data services problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
21. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
22. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
23. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Web data services? In other words, what are the risks, if Web data services does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
24. How are the Web data services’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
25. What situation(s) led to this Web data services Self Assessment?
<--- Score
26. What Web data services coordination do you need?
<--- Score
27. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
28. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
29. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
30.
