approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
50. Will team members perform Human language technology work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
51. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. How would you define Human language technology leadership?
<--- Score
54. How do you manage unclear Human language technology requirements?
<--- Score
55. Are accountability and ownership for Human language technology clearly defined?
<--- Score
56. Is Human language technology linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
57. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
58. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
59. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Human language technology leverage and how?
<--- Score
61. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
62. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
63. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
64. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
65. Is the Human language technology scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
66. What system do you use for gathering Human language technology information?
<--- Score
67. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
68. Is Human language technology currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
69. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
70. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
71. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
72. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
73. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
74. What is in scope?
<--- Score
75. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
76. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
77. Is there a critical path to deliver Human language technology results?
<--- Score
78. Are improvement team members fully trained on Human language technology?
<--- Score
79. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
80. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
81. Has a Human language technology requirement not been met?
<--- Score
82. What Human language technology services do you require?
<--- Score
83. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
84. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
85. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
86. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
87. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
88. How do you think the partners involved in Human language technology would have defined success?
<--- Score
89. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
90. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Human language technology? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
91. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
92. How are consistent Human language technology definitions important?
<--- Score
93. Who is gathering Human language technology information?
<---
