I.L. and Rausand, M. (2014). Defining complexity for risk assessment of sociotechnical systems: a conceptual framework. Proceeding of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 228 (3): 272–290.18 Kevin Reilly, C.W. (2020). Quantum computing, climate change, and interdependent AI: academics and execs predict how tech will revolutionize the next decade (29 January 2020). https://www.businessinsider.com/davos‐microsoft‐tech‐henry‐blodget‐panel‐2020‐1.
19 Kim, S., Xi, H., Mungle, S., and Son, Y.‐J. (2012). Modeling human interactions with learning under the extended belief – desire – intention framework using agent‐based simulation. 62nd IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2012.
20 Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M. et al. (2015). Simulating opinion dynamics on stakeholders’ networks through agent‐based modeling for collective transport decisions. Procedia Computer Science 52: 884–889.
21 Leffingwell, D., Knaster, R., Oren, I., and Jemilo, D. (2018). SAFe® 4.5 Reference Guide: Scaled Agile Framework® for Lean Enterprises. Scaled Agile, Incorporated.
22 Li, W., Bai, Q., Zhang, M. et al. (2016). Agent‐based influence propagation in social networks. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Agents (ICA), pp. 51–56.
23 Luna‐Reyes, L.F., Zhang, J., Gil‐García, J.R., and Cresswell, A.M. (2005). Information systems development as emergent socio‐technical change: a practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (1): 93–105. Special Issue: from Technical to Socio‐technical Change: Tackling the Human and Organisational Aspects of Systems Development Projects.
24 Mehler, J., McGee, S., and Edson, R. (2010). Leveraging systemigrams for conceptual analysis of complex systems: application to the U.S. National Security System. 8th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Hoboken, NJ (17–19 March 2010).
25 Mersino, A. (2018). Agile project success rates are 2X higher than traditional projects (1 April [2019 update]). https://vitalitychicago.com/blog/agile‐projects‐are‐more‐successful‐traditional‐projects (accessed 18 December 2019).
26 Misirli, T. and Bener, A.B. (2014). Bayesian networks for evidence‐based decision‐making in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 40 (6): 533–554.
27 Muller, R., Geraldi, J., and Turner, J.R. (2012). Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 59 (1): 77–90.
28 Netflix Technology Blog (2017). How we build code at Netflix (19 April). https://netflixtechblog.com/how‐we‐build‐code‐at‐netflix‐c5d9bd727f15 (accessed 19 December 2019).
29 Oliveira, M.D.B. and Gama, J. (2012). An overview of social network analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2 (2): 99–115.
30 Ortigosa, A., Martín, J.M., and Carro, R.M. (2014). Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e‐learning. Computers in Human Behavior: 527–541.
31 Poole, D., Mackworth, A., and Goebel, R. (1998). Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
32 Putra, D.W. (2019). How to make your own sentiment analyzer using Python and Google’s Natural Language API (12 February). https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how‐to‐make‐your‐own‐sentiment‐analyzer‐using‐python‐and‐googles‐natural‐language‐api‐9e91e1c493e (accessed 20 February 2020).
33 Ramos, A.L., Ferreira, J.V., and Barceló, J. (2012). Model‐based systems engineering: an emerging approach for modern systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews 42 (1): 101–111.
34 Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., and Bettenhausen, K.D. (2015). About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC‐PapersOnLine 48 (3): 567–572.
35 Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q. et al. (2018). Digital twin‐driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 94 (9–12): 3563–3576.
36 The Standish Group, International, Inc. (n.d.). The Chaos Report 2015. https://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research_files/CHAOSReport2015‐Final.pdf (accessed 19 December).
37 Tolk, A. and Hughes, T.K. (2014). Systems engineering, architecture, and simulation. In: Modeling and Simulation‐Based Systems Engineering Handbook (eds. D. Gianni, A. D’Ambrogio and A. Tolk), 11–41. CRC Press.
38 Tolk, A., Glazner, C.G., and Pitsko, R. (2017). Simulation‐based systems engineering. In: Guide to Simulation‐Based Disciplines – Advancing Our Computational Future, Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications, 75–102. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
39 Tracy, M., Cerdá, M., and Keyes, K.M. (2018). Agent‐based modeling in public health: current applications and future directions. The Annual Review of Public Health 39: 77–94.
40 Warkentin, M., Moore, R., Bekkering, E., and Johnston, A. (2009). Analysis of systems development project risks: an integrative framework. Database 40: 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531817.1531821.
41 Wünderlich, N.V. and Paluch, S. (2017). A nice and friendly chat with a bot: user perceptions of AI‐based service agents. ICIS.
42 Zimmerman, P. and Gilbert, T. (2017). Digital engineering transformation across the Department of Defense. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology and Technology 16 (4): 325–338.
Note
1 * Approved for Public Release; Release Unlimited. Public Release Case Number 20‐1208.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами
