Langone, A. (2018, Mar 22). #Metoo and time’s up founders explain the difference between the 2 movements—And how they’re alike. Time. Retrieved from https://time.com/5189945/whats-the-difference-between-the-metoo-and-times-up-movements/
Lee, D. (2018, November 1). Google staff walk out over women’s treatment. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46054202
Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lou, M. (2018, July 9). How Amazon has made money off racism and hate. Huffington Post. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/20200214010630/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/amazon-hate-groups-racism_n_5b3f7d5be4b07b827cbfcd43
Maheshwari, S. (2018, September 20). New pressure on Google and YouTube over children’s data. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/business/media/google-youtube-children-data.html
Manovich, L. (2003). New media from Borges to HTML. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & N. Montfort (Eds.), The new media reader (pp. 13–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McLaren, P. (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Murphy, P. (1996). Defining pedagogy. In P.F. Murphy & C.V. Gipps (Eds.), Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys (pp. 9–22). London, United Kingdom: Falmer Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression:data discrimination in the age of Google. New York: New York University Press.
Osnos, E. (2018, September 10). Can Mark Zuckerberg fix Facebook before it breaks democracy? The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/17/can-mark-zuckerberg-fix-facebook-before-it-breaks-democracy
Peppler, K. (2010). Media arts: Arts education for a digital age. Teachers College Record, 112(8), pp. 2118–2153.
Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Makeology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Quinn, T. M., Ploof, J., & Hochtritt, L. J. (Eds.). (2012). Art and social justice education: Culture as commons. New York, NY: Routledge.
Raley, R. (2009). Tactical media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ratto, M., & Boler, M. (Eds.). (2014). DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richardson, J. (2002, August). Language of tactical media. Subsol. Retrieved from http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/contributors2/richardsontext2.html
Romm, T. (2019, July 24). U.S. government issues stunning rebuke, historic $5 billion fine against Facebook for repeated privacy violations. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20190724135703/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/07/24/us-government-issues-stunning-rebuke-historic-billion-fine-against-facebook-repeated-privacy-violations/
←16 | 17→
Sayers, J. (Ed.). (2017). Making humanities matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schaer, C. (2019, July 12). Microsoft office 365: Banned in German schools over privacy fears. ZDNet. Retrieved from: https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-office-365-banned-in-german-schools-over-privacy-fears/
Simon, B. (1981). Why no pedagogy in England? In B. Simon & W. Taylor (Eds.), Education in the eighties (pp. 121–145). London, UK: Batsford.
Singer, P. W. (2019). Likewar: The weaponization of social media. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.
Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education. (2014). National core arts standards. National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. Retrieved from https://www.nationalartsstandards.org/
Sweeny, R. W. (2015). Dysfunction and decentralization in new media art and education. Chicago, IL: Intellect.
Tavin, K. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197–213.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
van der Meulen, S. (2017). A strong couple: New media and socially engaged art. Leonardo, 50(2), 170–176.
Wallin, A. (2017). Feminism in the archives and the archive in feminism: Propositions gleaned from Alex Martinis Roe’s to become two. Performance Paradigm, 13, 134–147.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
←17 | 18→
←18 | 19→
SECTION I
Formation: Digital Materiality and New Media Arts
←19 | 20→
←20 | 21→
CHAPTER ONE
Toward a Practice of Digital-Handicraft
M.C. BAUMSTARK AND THERESA SLATER
This chapter speculates emergent themes in the practice of the digital-handicraft, a hybridized field of making by considering the sense of touch, and its implications in interdisciplinary artmaking, new pedagogical models, and alternative modes of organizing and resisting. We begin by acknowledging affinities between craft and digital, recognizing ways that multiple hybrid digital-handicraft practices challenge the false binaries of hand and/or machine. Then, we examine ways the sense of touch functions as critical feedback in order to explore the intersections between hand-making and digital labor, calling attention to tacit knowledge, traditional teaching methods, and digital prosthesis. Haptic technologies
