(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Australia.33 Itomitsu, M. (2009). Developing a test of pragmatics of Japanese as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus.
34 Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co‐construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social lnteraction, 28(3), 171–83.
35 Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger Publishers.
36 Kasper, G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In K. Bardovi‐Harlig, J. C. Felix‐Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics & language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 281–314). University of Hawai'i at Manoa: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
37 Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–72.
38 Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London, England: Longman.
39 Litman, D., Strik, H., & Lim, G. S. (2018). Speech technologies and the assessment of second language speaking: Approaches, challenges, and opportunities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 294–309.
40 Liu, J. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
41 Matsumura, S. (2001). Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning, 51(4), 635–79.
42 Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
43 Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
44 Okada, Y. (2010). Role‐play in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1647–68.
45 Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46 Roever, C. (2001). A web‐based test of interlanguage pragmalinguistic knowledge: Speech acts, routines, implicatures (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa.
47 Roever, C. (2004). Difficulty and practicality in tests of interlanguage pragmatics. In D. Boxer & A. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform language learning (pp. 283–301). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
48 Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
49 Roever, C. (2006). Validation of a web‐based test of ESL pragmalinguistics. Language Testing, 23(2), 229–56.
50 Roever, C. (2007). DIF in the assessment of second language pragmatics. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 165–89.
51 Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C. (2014). Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web‐based test battery. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
52 Ross, S. J. (2017). Interviewing for language proficiency. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
53 Schauer, G. A. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56(2), 269–318.
54 Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55 Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.
56 Stokoe, E. (2013). The (in)authenticity of simulated talk: Comparing role‐played and actual interaction and the implications for communication training. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(2), 165–85.
57 Suendermann‐Oeft, D., Ramanarayanan, V., Yu, Z., Qian, Y., Evanini, K., Lange, P., . . . & Zechner, K. (2017). A multimodal dialog system for language assessment: Current state and future directions (Research report no. RR‐17‐21). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
58 Tada, M. (2005). Assessment of EFL pragmatic production and perception using video prompts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia.
59 Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 543–62.
60 Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 313–38.
61 Taguchi, N. (2008a). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study‐abroad context. Language Learning, 58(1), 33–71.
62 Taguchi, N. (2008b). Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 558–76.
63 Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Comprehension of conversational implicature in L2 Chinese. Pragmatics and Cognition, 21, 139–57.
64 Timpe, V. (2013). Assessing intercultural language learning. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
65 Timpe Laughlin, V., Wain, J., & Schmidgall, J. (2015). Defining and operationalizing the construct of pragmatic competence: Review and recommendations (ETS Research Report Series, 15–06). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
66 Walters, F. S. (2007). A conversation‐analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24(2), 155–83.
67 Walters, F. S. (2009). A conversation analysis‐informed test of L2 aural pragmatic comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 29–54.
68 Wang, L., Eignor, D., & Enright, M. K. (2008). A final analysis. In C. Chapelle, M. Enright, & J. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 259–318). New York, NY: Routledge.
69 Yamashita, S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical report #14). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
70 Yoshitake, S. S. (1997). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic competence of Japanese students of English as a foreign language: A multi‐test framework evaluation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia Pacific University, Novata, CA.
71 Youn, S. J. (2013). Validating task based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu.
72 Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225.
73 Young, R. (2008). Discursive practices in language learning and teaching, Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.
Assessment of Reading
KEIKO KODA
Brief History of Reading Research
Assessing reading ability requires a theory of what constitutes reading ability. However, conceptualizations of reading ability have dramatically changed over the past several decades. In the early days, the field was dominated by two diametrically opposing views, one
