Cases in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Melissa B. Miller

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Cases in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases - Melissa B. Miller страница 43

Cases in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases - Melissa B. Miller

Скачать книгу

receive this new vaccine?

      6 6. What type of isolation precautions should have been used while this patient was in the hospital? What therapy (if any) should have been provided to health care workers in close contact with this patient prior to institution of appropriate precautions?

      1. The patient was infected with Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough. With classic whooping cough, children have paroxysmal coughing, which is a series of coughs during a single expiration. Paroxysms are often accompanied by a “whoop” sound in children due to rapid inspiration through a narrow trachea. (An audio file of a child with pertussis can be found at www.immunizationed.org.) Because of repetitive coughing and resulting disruption of breathing, children will have abnormal oxygen exchange and will often turn red and sometimes blue. The repetitive coughing may also result in vomiting or choking on respiratory secretions. Although the classic “whooping” sound was not described for this child, she did have bouts of coughing leading to increased respiration, decreased oxygenation, and posttussive vomiting. In infants <6 months old, apnea is more common than whooping inspirations. Further, the patient had a lymphocytosis, which is commonly seen in pertussis. Although the etiologic agent is a bacterium, the disease is toxin mediated, explaining the rise in lymphocyte count. Historically, the pertussis toxin (a key virulence factor of B. pertussis) has also been described as the “lymphocytosis-promoting factor.” Clinically, lymphocytosis, often as high as 70 to 80%, is routinely seen in patients with pertussis and is a distinguishing characteristic of this infection.

      2. B. pertussis specifically binds to ciliated epithelial cells. This binding is mediated primarily by filamentous hemagglutinin, an important virulence factor of this organism. Since the nasopharynx is lined with ciliated epithelial cells, it is the most sensitive site for the detection of B. pertussis.

image

      For many years, direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) for B. pertussis was done. This assay takes ~2 hours, versus 7 to 10 days for culture, but it has a sensitivity of only 50 to 65%, and false-positive results may occur, especially when laboratorians are unaccustomed to reading these DFA smears. DFA is no longer in the CDC’s diagnostic algorithm for pertussis because of these limitations.

      NAAT, and in particular PCR, has become the method of choice for diagnosing pertussis. Because PCR does not require that the organisms be alive, it is useful when specimens must be transported long distances. PCR is more rapid than culture, with results often available the same day the specimen was collected. PCR is more sensitive than culture and has a high negative predictive value. There are two FDA-cleared molecular products for the detection of B. pertussis. One is a 20-plex test that detects a number of respiratory viruses and bacteria simultaneously, while the other is a stand-alone test. Many laboratories use laboratory-developed NAATs for the detection of B. pertussis. The performance of these tests varies widely. Sensitivity and specificity are dependent on the target used for amplification, with the most sensitive tests targeting multicopy sequences and the most specific tests detecting multiple targets. The primary concern for PCR-based diagnosis of pertussis is the risk of false-positive results. False-positive PCR results have been the subject of “pseudo” outbreaks of pertussis that have been linked to cross-reacting Bordetella spp. (e.g., B. holmesii), laboratory contamination, and environmental contamination at collection. Interestingly, it has been reported that false-positive results can occur when specimens are collected in the same clinic room where pertussis vaccines (some of which contain genomic DNA) are administered. Since there is no perfect test for the diagnosis of pertussis, the CDC recommends that both culture and PCR be used diagnostically.

      Macrolide antibiotics (e.g., azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin) are the drugs of choice for treating pertussis. In addition to delay in administering antibiotics (as was the case with this child), reasons for a lack of response to therapy might include patient noncompliance. Erythromycin, in particular, is often associated with gastrointestinal intolerance. Secondary bacterial pneumonia, an occasional complication of pertussis, must also be considered in patients with persistent cough, particularly if the patient worsens clinically. Finally, the possibility that the organism is resistant to macrolides must be considered. Although macrolide-resistant B. pertussis isolates have been described, susceptibility surveys suggest resistance is still rare.

      4. B. pertussis has many virulence factors that are responsible for mediating attachment to host cells and causing tissue damage. Pertussis toxin acts as both a secreted toxin and an adhesin working synergistically with filamentous hemagglutinin. Pertussis toxin belongs to the classic A-B family of ADP-ribosylating toxins (like cholera toxin and Shiga toxin). Additional toxins include adenylate cyclase-hemolysin, a cytotoxin that inhibits chemotaxis and induces apoptosis of macrophages; tracheal cytotoxin, which eliminates mucociliary clearance by ciliostasis and extrusion of ciliated cells and inhibits DNA synthesis; dermonecrotic toxin, which causes dermal necrosis and vasoconstriction; and lipopolysaccharide endotoxin, which has proinflammatory activity. Taken together, these pathogenic properties result in a grossly damaged respiratory epithelium with decreased mucociliary

Скачать книгу