Cases in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Melissa B. Miller
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Cases in Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases - Melissa B. Miller страница 48
4. There are several diagnostic approaches that offer a rapid result, each with varying sensitivities. Rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), or rapid antigen tests, offer results in ~15 minutes. However, these tests can have sensitivities as low as 59% and have been shown to be a source of significant false-positive results, particularly at the beginning and end of RSV season, due to the decreased prevalence and positive predictive value. The advantage of the EIA method, and the reason it is widely used, is that it is easy to perform. A disadvantage of this technique is that specimen quality cannot be assessed. Another rapid method is the direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA), which offers results in 1 to 2 hours. Unlike the rapid EIA, DFA requires well-trained laboratory personnel to correctly perform and interpret the fluorescent results. The sensitivity and specificity of DFA can be directly correlated with laboratory expertise, but in general its performance is at least as good as culture. Specimen quality can be judged by the DFA technique, as the patient’s nasopharyngeal cells can be quantified. Culture can be performed relatively rapidly using the rapid centrifugation, or shell vial, culture technique. The patient’s specimen is gently centrifuged onto a permissive cell layer to promote virus-cell contact and decrease the time needed to detect infected cells if the virus is present in the patient’s specimen. To visualize viral infection, the laboratory uses an antibody pool consisting of antibodies specific for RSV, parainfluenza viruses, influenza A and B viruses, and adenovirus to fluorescently stain the shell vial monolayer after 24 to 48 hours of incubation. Depending on the antibody pool used, either the color of fluorescence can indicate which virus is present or antibodies specific for individual viruses can be used to detect the specific agent causing the infection. This method is typically used only if other rapid methods, such as EIA and DFA, are negative. Shell vial cultures are very specific, with 70 to 80% sensitivity, but take ~2 days to obtain results.
More recently, molecular methods have become commercially available to diagnose respiratory viral infections. Most of these products detect a panel of respiratory viruses, including RSV. Some detect only influenza A, influenza B, and RSV, while others detect 12 or more viruses. The time to result for these molecular platforms varies from 70 minutes to 8 hours. Some of the tests provide random access testing, while others are more efficiently performed in daily batches. The main advantage of molecular detection of RSV is increased sensitivity, but specimen quality is not determined. The primary obstacle in routinely performing these tests in the clinical laboratory is the cost of the equipment, reagents, and personnel needed to perform molecular testing. Independent of the method used to diagnose RSV in the laboratory, a rapid result is important for management decisions, including infection control and treatment. Although rapid detection of respiratory viruses has been hypothesized to decrease unnecessary use of antibiotics and decrease length of hospital stay, there are few supporting data in the literature.
5. Since there is not a vaccine available to prevent infection nor is there a broadly effective antiviral agent to treat RSV, infants who are at risk for severe RSV disease should receive passive immunoprophylaxis with a humanized mouse monoclonal antibody preparation against RSV called palivizumab. Although expensive, palivizumab has been shown to decrease hospitalization rates by 50% and total wheezing days in the first year of life by 61%. At-risk infants receive five monthly doses of palivizumab during RSV season, typically November through March. This includes infants/children <24 months old with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease and infants <12 months old who were born prematurely or have congenital abnormality or neuromuscular condition of the airway.
Like all respiratory viruses, RSV can cause health care-associated infections; therefore, patients with RSV infections should be put on droplet and contact precautions to prevent spread to other patients via health care personnel. If patients are not isolated and stringent infection control practices are not followed, secondary infection rates of 20 to 50% can occur. Cohorting of RSV-positive children and their health care providers, plus the use of gloves and gowns during contact with infected children and consistent hand washing before and after patient contact, has been shown to significantly lower RSV health care-associated infection rates. Though positive patients may be cohorted when private rooms are not available, many centers do not consider the sensitivity of the EIA high enough to place a child with a negative test in the same room as another child if there is a clinical suspicion of RSV. However, the negative predictive value of most of the molecular tests available would alleviate this concern. As with primary RSV infections, hospitalized patients with congenital heart disease, pulmonary disease, or an immunodeficiency are at greatest risk for life-threatening RSV infections.
6. No drugs that specifically target RSV are available for treatment. However, ribavirin (a nucleoside analog) has good in vitro activity against RSV and is FDA approved for RSV treatment. Ribavirin is generally delivered by aerosol since oral or intravenous administration may result in hepatic or bone marrow toxicity. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against the routine use of ribavirin in infants and children with lower respiratory tract illness because its efficacy in this population has not been proven. Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated conflicting results. Further, ribavirin treatment is expensive. Treatment of RSV infection with ribavirin is reserved for immunosuppressed patients with severe RSV infection. Several reports have demonstrated that early administration of ribavirin significantly decreased lower respiratory tract illness, morbidity, and mortality in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Palivizumab cannot be used as a treatment for RSV; it only provides passive protection against infection.
REFERENCES
1. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2012. Respiratory syncytial virus, p 609–618. In Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS (ed), Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 28th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL.
2. Blanken MO, Rovers MM, Molenaar JM, Winkler-Seinstra PL, Meijer A, Kimpen JL, Bont L; Dutch RSV Neonatal Network. 2013. Respiratory syncytial virus and recurrent wheeze in healthy preterm infants. N Engl J Med 368:1791–1799.
3. Leclair JM, Freeman J, Sullivan BF, Crowley CM, Goldmann DA. 1987. Prevention of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections through compliance with glove and gown isolation precautions. N Engl J Med 317:329–334.
4. Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Shah JN, El Taoum KK, Jiang Y, Popat U, Hosing C, Rondon G, Tarrand JJ, Champlin RE, Chemaly RF. 2013. Impact of aerosolized ribavirin on mortality in 280 allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1872–1880.
5. Tregoning JS, Schwarze J. 2010. Respiratory viral infections in infants: causes, clinical symptoms, virology, and immunology. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:74–98.
6. van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S, Watkiss ER. 2012. Pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus. Curr Opin Virol 2:300–305.
7. Villenave R, Shields MD, Power UF. 2013. Respiratory syncytial virus interaction with human airway epithelium. Trends Microbiol 21:238–244.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен