of highly educated individuals who are of no use to capital (who cannot find jobs). But instead of protesting against this meaningless spending of financial resources, should we not celebrate this result as an unexpected sign of the expansion of the “realm of freedom”?
Maybe this gap can function as a source of hope, maybe it opens up the possibility of radical change: the logic of capital gets threatened not from some external nonintegrated rest, but from its own inner inconsistency, which explodes when subsumption gets total.
Notes
1 4. Quoted from http://crisiscritique.org/april2019/milner.pdf.
2 5. I rely here heavily on Maria Chehonadskih, “Soviet Epistemologies and the Materialist Ontology of Poor Life: Andrei Platonov, Alexander Bogdanov and Lev Vygotsky.” Unpublished manuscript, from which all non-attributed quotes are taken.
3 6. Etienne Balibar “Towards a New Critique of Political Economy: From Generalized Surplus-Value to Total Subsumption,” in Capitalism: Concept, Idea, Image (Kingston: CRMEP Books, 2019).
4 7. Balibar, “Towards a New Critique of Political Economy,” p. 51.
5 8. Balibar, “Towards a New Critique of Political Economy,” p. 53.
6 9. Balibar, “Towards a New Critique of Political Economy,” p. 57.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
