Gastrointestinal Surgical Techniques in Small Animals. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Gastrointestinal Surgical Techniques in Small Animals - Группа авторов страница 27
4.5.2 Materials and Equipment
A large diameter (28 Fr) gastrostomy (Kangaroo gastrostomy feeding tube, Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN) and a 9 Fr jejunal feeding tube 89 cm long (Kangaroo jejunostomy feeding Tube, Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN) are used. The jejunostomy tube is weighted.
4.5.3 Technique
The gastrostomy tube is placed first as described above. A flexible tip wire is advanced in the jejunostomy tube. The wire‐jejunostomy tube construct is then advanced in the gastrostomy tube and manually directed through the wall of the stomach in the pylorus and the duodenum. The jejunostomy tube is advanced in the proximal jejunum (Figure 4.11). The wire is removed and the jejunostomy tube is flushed to make sure there is no resistance due to a kink. The jejunostomy tube and the gastrotomy tube connect together with a special adaptor in the hub of the gastrostomy tube.
4.5.4 Tips
To facilitate the placement of the jejunostomy tube it is very helpful to advance the gastrostomy tube first through the pylorus. The gastrostomy tube can be manipulated through the stomach wall to be directed into the pylorus. Then it is easier to feed the jejunostomy tube with its wire in the duodenum. It is also very important not to let the jejunostomy tube make a loop in the stomach. If a loop of the jejunostomy tube is in the stomach, it might kink and occlude the jejunostomy tube. Also, if there is a loop in the stomach the jejunostomy tube might migrate back and coil in the lumen of the stomach.
References
1 Abood, S.K. and Buffington, C.A. (1991). Improved nasogastric intubation technique for administration of nutritional support in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 199 (5): 577–579.
2 Abood, S.K. and Buffington, C.A. (1992). Enteral feeding of dogs and cats: 51 cases (1989–1991). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 201 (4): 619–622.
3 Armstrong, P.J. and Hardie, E.M. (1990b). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – a retrospective study of 54 clinical cases in dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 4 (4): 202–206.
4 Armstrong, P.J. et al. (1990a). Enteral nutrition by tube. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 20 (1): 237–275.
5 Bright, R.M. et al. (1991). Percutaneous tube gastrostomy for enteral alimentation in small animals. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet. 13: 15–22.
6 Cavanaugh, R.P. et al. (2008). Evaluation of surgically placed gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes in critically ill dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 232 (3): 380–388.
7 Crowe, D.T. Jr. (1986). Use of a nasogastric tube for gastric and esophageal decompression in the dog and cat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 188 (10): 1178–1182.
8 Crowe, D.T. and Devey, J.J. (1997a). Esophagostomy tubes for feeding and decompression: clinical experience in 29 small animal patients. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33: 393–403.
9 Crowe, D.T. and Devey, J.J. (1997b). Esophagostomy tubes for feeding and decompression: clinical experience in 29 small animal patients. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33 (5): 393–403.
10 Cummings, F. and Daley, C.A. (2014). Esophagojejunostomy feeding tube placement in 5 dogs with pancreatitis and anorexia. Vet. Med. Int. 2014: 197294.
11 Daye, R.M. et al. (1999). Interlocking box jejunostomy: a new technique for enteral feeding. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 35 (2): 129–134.
12 Devitt, C.M. and Seim, H.B. (1997). Clinical evaluation of tube esophagostomy in small animals. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33 (1): 55–60.
13 Herring, J.M. (2016). A novel placement technique for nasogastric and nasoesophageal tubes. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 26 (4): 593–597.
14 Heuter, K. (2004). Placement of jejunal feeding tubes for post‐gastric feeding. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 19 (1): 32–42.
15 Hewitt, S.A. et al. (2004). Evaluation of laparoscopic‐assisted placement of jejunostomy feeding tubes in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 225 (1): 65–71.
16 Jergens, A.E. et al. (2007). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube placement in healthy dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 21 (1): 18–24.
17 Kanemoto, Y. et al. (2017). Long‐term management of a dog with idiopathic megaesophagus and recurrent aspiration pneumonia by use of an indwelling esophagostomy tube for suction of esophageal content and esophagogastric tube feeding. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 79 (1): 188–191.
18 Levine, P.B. et al. (1997). Esophagostomy tubes as a method of nutritional management in cats: a retrospective study. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 33 (5): 405–410.
19 Marks, S.L. (1998). The principles and practical application of enteral nutrition. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 28 (3): 677–708.
20 Song, E.K. et al. (2008). Comparison of different tube materials and use of Chinese finger trap or four friction suture technique for securing gastrostomy, jejunostomy, and thoracostomy tubes in dogs. Vet. Surg. 37 (3): 212–221.
21 Yoshimoto, S.K. et al. (2006). Owner experiences and complications with home use of a replacement low profile gastrostomy device for long‐term enteral feeding in dogs. Can. Vet. J. 47 (2): 144–150.
22 Yu, M.K. et al. (2013). Comparison of complication rates in dogs with nasoesophageal versus nasogastric feeding tubes. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 23 (3): 300–304.
5 Drainage Techniques for the Peritoneal Space
Eric Monnet
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
5.1 Indications
Drainage of the peritoneal space has been mostly performed for the treatment of peritonitis (Salisbury and Hosgood 1989; Hosgood 1990; Hosgood et al. 1991; Ludwig et al. 1997; Staatz et al. 2002; Buote and Havig 2012; Adams et al. 2014). Septic peritonitis and chemical peritonitis are the two most common conditions that are treated with some form of drainage. The main goal of the drainage is to decrease the bacterial load and/or to reduce the amount of chemical present in the pleural space.
Drainage is mostly indicated for generalized septic peritonitis. Drainage is also indicated if the cause of the peritonitis could not be totally controlled at the time of surgery (pancreatitis). Drainage is also indicated for a septic peritonitis associated with severe contamination with foreign materials (rupture of colon). The risk versus benefit of drainage has not been evaluated in a prospective