Internal Combustion Engines. Allan T. Kirkpatrick
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Internal Combustion Engines - Allan T. Kirkpatrick страница 43
A single cylinder engine operates at
1 What is displacement volume , the volume at bottom dead center, , and the dimensionless heat addition ?
2 Calculate the nondimensional parameters , and .
3 Plot the effect of changing the start of energy release from −50 to +20 atdc on the thermal efficiency and imep of the engine.
Solution
1 The parameters , , and are:
2 and , and are
3 The engine parameters are entered into the FiniteHeatMassLoss.m program as shown below.function [ ] = FiniteHeatMassLoss( ) Gas cycle heat release code with heat and mass transfer thetas = -20; start of heat release (deg) thetad = 40; duration of heat release (deg) Neng = 1910; engine speed (rev/min) r =10; compression ratio b=0.10; bore (m) s=0.0675; stroke (m) gamma = 1.4; gas const Q = 20.; dimensionless heat release ht = 500; heat transfer coefficient (W/m^2-K) T_1 = 300; bottom dead center temperature (K) P_1 = 100; pressure at bdc (kPa) T_w = 360; cylinder wall temp (K) aw = 5; Wiebe parameter a nw = 3; Wiebe exponent n c = 0.8; mass loss coeff ...
The results are presented in Figures 2.21 and 2.22, and representative thermodynamic parameters are compared with the simple energy release computation with no heat or mass loss in Table 2.5. With the heat and mass transfer included, maximum efficiency is reduced from 0.60 to 0.52, and the maximum nondimensional imep is reduced from 13.24 to 11.55.
The cumulative work and heat/mass transfer loss is plotted in Figure 2.23 as a function of crank angle for the optimum case of
The general dependence of the efficiency and imep on the start of energy release is very similar for both cases, as the optimum start of ignition remains at approximately 20
Figure 2.21 Thermal efficiency vs. start of energy release for Examples 2.5 and 2.6.
Figure 2.22 Imep vs. start of energy release for Examples 2.5 and 2.6.
Table 2.5 Comparison of Energy Release Models with and without heat/mass transfer loss at
w/o heat & mass loss | w/ heat & mass loss | |
|
87.77 | 85.31 |
|
11.00 | 11.00 |
Net Work/ |
11.91 | 10.39 |
Efficiency |
0.596 | 0.520 |
|
0.990 | 0.863 |
Imep/ |
13.24 | 11.55 |