Point-of-Care Ultrasound Techniques for the Small Animal Practitioner. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Point-of-Care Ultrasound Techniques for the Small Animal Practitioner - Группа авторов страница 88

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Techniques for the Small Animal Practitioner - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

rule out pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade and right‐sided cardiac failure, and placing the constellation of patient information (history, physical examination, laboratory findings, imaging) within the complete clinical picture is important to avoid mistakes and “satisfaction of search error.”

       Adult dogs and cats should have no free fluid within their peritoneal cavity or retroperitoneal space (or within the pleural cavity or pericardial sac); however, recent research evaluating anesthetized adult dogs and cats, and puppies and kittens has documented small pockets of free intraabdominal fluid in clinically normal canines and felines.

       The originally published AFAST‐applied abdominal fluid scoring system was scored according to number for positive AFAST views (range 0–4) excluding the bonus 5th view that is not part of the AFS. However, to better distinguish small‐volume bleeder/effusion from large‐volume bleeder/effusion, AFS at each AFAST view now ranges from 0 (negative) to ½ (small pocket <5 mm in cats and <10 mm in dogs) to 1 (>5 mm cats and >10 mm dogs).

       Total AFS remains similar as originally published with the categorization of small‐volume bleeder/effusion defined as AFS <3 (AFS ranges from 0 to 2½, thus including AFS of 1, 1½, 2 and 2½) and large‐volume bleeder/effusion defined as AFS ≥3 (AFS ranges from 3 to 4, including AFS of 3, 3½, and 4).

       Expect ~50% of adult dogs to have an AFS of ½ along the diaphragm at the DH view with maximum dimensions of <3 mm that may not be noticeable in unsedated, unanesthetized adults (Lisciandro et al. 2019).

       Expect ~90% of puppies <6 months of age to have an AFS of ½ to 1 along the diaphragm at the DH view and then with fairly equal distribution between the other three AFAST views of ½ to 1 with maximum dimensions of <3 mm (Lisciandro et al. 2019).Figure 7.16. AFAST goal‐directed template.Source: Reproduced with permission of Dr Gregory Lisciandro, Hill Country Veterinary Specialists and FASTVet.com, Spicewood, TX.

       Expect that ~70% of adult cats and kittens <6 months of age will have AFS of ½ along the diaphragm at the DH view and then next most commonly positive in both age groups at the most gravity‐dependent umbilical view (SR view in left lateral recumbency) with maximum dimensions at either of these AFAST views of <3 mm that may or may not be noticeable in unsedated, unanesthetized adult cats and kittens (Lisciandro et al. 2015).

       Any mass found to deform the splenic capsule on a focused spleen view should always be considered a serious finding.

       The FAST DH view should be considered nearly 100% sensitive and 100% specific for the detection of clinically relevant PCE in both dogs and cats in standing or sternal positioning.

       Serial examinations should always be performed after resuscitation and rehydration of the patient with at least one more AFAST examination (or a Global FAST) and whenever the patient is failing inpatient or outpatient care.

       The finding of sonographic striation of the canine gallbladder wall should be considered abnormal in the acute setting (acute collapse and weakness) even when the thickness is in the normal range of 1–3 mm and anaphylaxis, “anaphylactic gallbladder,” and right‐sided congestive heart failure, “cardiac gallbladder,” should be ruled out using the Global FAST approach.

       Although rare in cats, a “cardiac gallbladder” may occur with feline congestive heart failure.

       Characterization of the CVC may be categorized as a “bounce” and fluid responsive, “FAT” and fluid intolerant, or “flat” and hypovolemic.

       Maximum heights at the FAST DH view may be used to additionally characterize the CVC (see Tables 7.6 and 36.3).

      1 American College of Emergency Physicians. 2001. ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines – 2001. Ann Emerg Med 38:470–481.

      2 Bilello JF, Davis JW, Lemaster D, et al. 2011. Prehospital hypotension in blunt trauma: identifying the “crump factor.” J Trauma 70(5):1038–1042.

      3 Birkbeck R, Greensmith T, Humm K, et al. 2019. Haemoabdomen due to suspect anaphylaxis in four dogs. Vet Rec Case Rep 7:e000734.

      4 Blackbourne LH, Soffer D, McKenney M, et al. 2004. Secondary ultrasound examination increases the sensitivity of the FAST exam in trauma, J Trauma 57(5):934–938.

      5 Borahay MA, Harirah HM, Olseon G, et al. 2011. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemoperitoneum, and reversible ischemic neurological deficit complicating anaphylaxis to prophylactic antibiotics during cesarean delivery: a case report and review of literature. Am J Perinatol Reports 1(1):15–19.

      6 Boysen SR, Lisciandro GR. 2013. The use of ultrasound in the emergency room (AFAST and TFAST). Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 43(4):773–797.

      7 Boysen SR, Rozanski EA, Tidwell AS, et al. 2004. Evaluation of a focused assessment with sonography for trauma protocol to detect free abdominal fluid in dogs involved in motor vehicle accidents. J Am Vet Med Assoc 225(8):1198–1204.

      8 Bucci M, Rabozzi R, Guglielmini C, et al. 2017. Respiratory variation in aortic blood peak velocity and caudal vena cava diameter can predict fluid responsiveness in anaesthetised and mechanically ventilated dogs. Vet J 227:30–35.

      9 Caldwell DJ, Petras KE, Mattison BL, et al. 2018. Spontaneous hemoperitoneum and anaphylactic shock associated with Hymenoptera envenomation in a dog. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 28(5):476–482.

      10 Cambournac M, Goy‐Thollot I, Violé A, et al. 2018. Sonographic assessment of volaemia: development and validation of a new method in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 59(3):174–182.

      11 Candotti C, Arntfield R. Pericardial effusion. In: Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound, edited by Soni NJ, Arntfield R, and Kory P. Philadephia: Elsevier, pp 130–134.

      12 Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, et al. 2017. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 12:5.

      13 Cole LP, Humm K. 2019. Twelve autologous blood transfusions in eight cats with hemoperitoenum. J Feline Med Surg 21:481–487.

      14 Côté E, Schwarz LA, Sithole F. 2013. Thoracic radiographic findings for dogs with cardiac tamponade attributable to pericardial effusion. J Am Vet Med Assoc 243(2):232–235.

      15 Culp WT, Weisse C, Kellogg ME, et al. 2010. Spontaneous hemoperitoneum in cats: 65 cases (1994–2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 236(9):978–982.

      16 d'Anjou M, Penninck D. 2015. Liver. In: Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography, 2nd edition, edited by d'Anjou M, Penninck D. Ames: Wiley Blackwell, p 220.

      17 Davidson BJ, Paling AC, Lahmers SL, et al. 2008. Disease association and clinical assessment of feline pericardial effusion. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 44(1):5–9.

      18 Darnis E, Boysen S, Merveille AC, et al. 2018. Establishment of references values of the caudal vena cava by fast‐ultrasonography through different views in healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med 32(4):1308–1318.

      19 Fahey R, Rozanski E, Paul A, et al. 2017. Prevalence of vomiting in dogs with pericardial effusion. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 27(2): 250–252.

Скачать книгу