The Negro in Chicago: A Study of Race Relations and a Race Riot. Chicago Commission on Race Relations

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Negro in Chicago: A Study of Race Relations and a Race Riot - Chicago Commission on Race Relations страница 41

The Negro in Chicago: A Study of Race Relations and a Race Riot - Chicago Commission on Race Relations

Скачать книгу

Bethel 650 800 Walters 351 338

      Adjustment to new conditions was taken up by the Urban League as its principal work. Co-operating with the Travelers Aid Society, United Charities, and other agencies of the city, it met the migrants at stations and, as far as its facilities permitted, secured living quarters and jobs for them. The churches took them into membership and attempted to make them feel at home. Negro newspapers published instructions on dress and conduct and had great influence in smoothing down improprieties of manner which were likely to provoke criticism and intolerance in the city.

      Individual experiences of the migrants in this period of adjustment were often interesting. The Commission made a special effort to note these experiences for the light they throw upon the general process. Much of the adjustment was a double process, including the adjustment of rural southern Negroes to northern urban conditions. It is to be remembered that over 70 per cent of the Negro population of the South is rural. This means familiarity with rural methods, simple machinery, and plain habits of living. Farmers and plantation workers coming to Chicago had to learn new tasks. Skilled craftsmen had to relearn their trades when they were thrown amid the highly specialized processes of northern industries. Domestic servants went into industry. Professional men who followed their clientèle had to re-establish themselves in a new community. The small business men could not compete with the Jewish merchants, who practically monopolized the trade of Negroes near their residential areas, or with the "Loop" stores.

      Many Negroes sold their homes and brought their furniture with them. Reinvesting in property frequently meant a loss; the furniture brought was often found to be unsuited to the tiny apartments or large, abandoned dwelling-houses they were able to rent or buy.

      The change of home carried with it in many cases a change of status. The leader in a small southern community, when he came to Chicago, was immediately absorbed into the struggling mass of unnoticed workers. School teachers, male and female, whose positions in the South carried considerable prestige, had to go to work in factories and plants because the disparity in educational standards would not permit continuance of their profession in Chicago.

      These illustrations in Table VI, taken from family histories, show how adjustment led to inferior occupation.

TABLE VI
Occupation in South Occupation on First Arrival in Chicago Occupation One or More Years Later
Display man on furniture Laborer Laborer in factory
Stone mason Laborer in coal yard Laborer in Stock Yards
Proprietor of café Laborer Elevator man
Farmer Laborer in Stock Yards Laborer in Stock Yards
Coal miner Porter in tailoring shop Janitor
Proprietor of boarding-house Laborer Laborer in Stock Yards
Farmer Factory worker Factory worker
Barber Painter Janitor
Hotel waiter Waiter Porter in factory
Plasterer Laborer in Stock Yards Laborer in steel mill
Farmer Hostler Laborer in livery stable
Clergyman Stationary fireman Laborer in Stock Yards
Tinsmith Waiter Laborer
Farmer Laborer in cement factory Laborer in Stock Yards
Blacksmith Barber Janitor
Office boy Porter Laborer in Stock Yards

      The following experiences of one or two families from the many histories gathered, while not entirely typical of all the migrants, contain features common to all:

      The Thomas family.—Mr. Thomas, his wife and two children, a girl nineteen and a boy seventeen, came to Chicago from Seals, Alabama, in the spring of 1917. After a futile search, the family rented rooms for the first week. This was expensive and inconvenient, and between working hours all sought a house into which they could take their furniture. They finally found a five-room flat on Federal Street. The building had been considered uninhabitable and dangerous. Three of the five rooms were almost totally dark. The plumbing was out of order. There was no bath, and the toilet was outside of the house. There was neither electricity nor gas, and the family used oil lamps. The rent was $15 per month. Although the combined income of the family could easily have made possible a better house, they could find none.

      Mr. and Mrs. Thomas were farmers in the South. On the farm Mrs. Thomas did the work of a man along with her husband. Both are illiterate. The daughter had reached the fourth grade and the boy the fifth grade in school. At home they belonged to a church and various fraternal orders and took part in rural community life.

      On their arrival in Chicago they were short of funds. Father and son went to work at the Stock Yards. Although they had good jobs they found their income insufficient; the girl went to work in a laundry, and the mother worked as a laundress through the first winter for $1 a day. She later discovered that she was working for half the regular rate for laundry work. Soon she went back to housekeeping to reduce the food bill.

      All the family were timid and self-conscious and for a long time avoided contacts, thus depriving themselves of helpful suggestions. The children became ashamed of the manners of their parents and worked diligently to correct their manner of speech. The children attended Wendell Phillips night school in the hope of improving their community status.

      The freedom and independence of Negroes in the North have been a constant novelty to them and many times they have been surprised that they were "not noticed enough to be mistreated." They have tried out various amusement places, parks, ice-cream parlors, and theaters near their home on the South Side and have enjoyed them because they were denied these opportunities in their former home.

      The combined income of this family is $65 a week, and their rent is now low. Many of their old habits have been preserved because of the isolation in which they have lived and because they have not been able to move into better housing.

      The Jones family.—Mr. Jones,

Скачать книгу