The “and” here is key to differentiating Luther from Melanchthon—i.e., Luther’s dual-emphases on the Person and work of Christ. Kärkkäinen, “The Holy Spirit and Justification,” 32.
18. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 81, 84–85
19. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 85.
20. Swain, “The Trinity in the Reformers,” 228.
21. Powell, The Trinity in German Thought, 16.
22. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 198.
23. Melanchthon, The Chief Theological Topics: Loci Praecipui Theologici 1559, 10.
24. Powell, The Trinity in German Thought, 6.
25. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 80.
26. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 62.
27. Melanchthon, Loci Praecipui Theologici, 17–39.
28. Melanchthon, Augsburg Confession, 100.
29. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 79–80.
30. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 149.
31. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 85.
32. Mannermaa, Christ Present, 17.
33. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 146.
34. Mannermaa, Christ Present, 19.
35. Mannermaa, Christ Present, 53.
36. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 148.
37. Melanchthon, Augsburg Confession, 101.
38. Maurer, Historical Commentary on the Augsburg Confession, 343.
39. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 113.
40. Rogness, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 112.
41. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 149.
42. Rognass, Melanchthon: Reformer without Honor, 63.
43. Prenter, Spiritus Creator, 31–65.
44. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 148.
45. Hinlicky, Paths not Taken, 177.
46. Radner, “The Holy Spirit and Unity,” 1 n.1.
47. Leibniz is mentioned in the conclusion as a philosopher who inherited the theological tendencies of Melanchthon.
48. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel, 62.
49. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel, 62
50. Hegel, Phänomenologie Des Geistes, passim; Hegel, Vorlesungen Über die Philosophie Der Religion, passim.
51. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 155.
52. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 155.
53. Fritzman, Hegel, 23.
54. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 60.
55. Williamson, An Introduction to Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion, 293.
56. Schlitt, German Idealism’s Trinitarian Legacy, 23–24.
57. O’Regan asserts that “Hegel’s Trinitarianism is not tri-personal” (“Kant, Hegel, Schelling,” 260–61).
58. Powell notes that “it is necessary to use quotation marks with ‘being’ because. . .God is not, according to Hegel, a being” (The Trinity in German Thought, 120–134).
59. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 15–16, 41.
60. Kärkkäinen, Pneumatology, 83–85. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 10.
61. Olson, Hegel and the Spirit, 33.
62. Powell, The Trinity
