———. Luther’s Works. Vol. 20, Minor Prophets III: Zechariah, edited by J. Pelican. St Louis: Concordia, 1973.
———. Luther’s Works. Vol. 26, Lectures on Galatians Chapters 1–4, edited by J. Pelican. St Louis: Concordia, 1963.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Theory and History of Literature 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
McLean, Bradley H. Biblical Interpretation and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Muindi, Samuel W. Pentecostal-Charismatic Prophecy: Empirical-Theological Analysis. Oxford: Lang, 2017.
Muller, Richard, and John Thompson. “The Significance of Pre-Critical Exegesis.” In Biblical Interpretation in the Era of the Reformation, 39–57, edited by Richard Muller and John Thompson. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life. Translated by Peter Preus. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.
O’Connor, Kathleen M. “How the Text Is Heard: The Biblical Theology of Brevard Childs.” Religious Studies Review 21 (1995) 91–95.
Phan, Peter C. “Method in Liberation Theologies.” Theological Studies 61 (2000) 40–63.
Peckham, John C. “The Analogy of Scripture Revisited: A Final Form Canonical Approach to Systematic Theology.” Mid-America Journal of Theology 22 (2011) 41–53.
Plass, Ewald. What Luther Says.Vol. 1. St. Louis: Concordia, 1959.
Poland, Lynn M. Literary Criticism and Biblical Hermeneutics: A Critique of Formalist Approaches. Chico, CA: Scholars, 1985.
Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
———. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation. Edited and translated by John B. Thompson. Cambridge Philosophy Classics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
———. “Philosophical Hermeneutics and Theological Hermeneutics.” Studies in Religion 5 (1975) 14–33.
———. “Toward a Hermeneutic Idea of Revelation.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977) 1–37.
Sanders, James A. “Biblical Criticism and the Bible as Canon.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 32 (1977) 157–65.
———. “Text and Canon: Concepts and Method.” Journal of Biblical Literature 98 (1979) 5–29.
———. Canon and Community: A Guide to Canonical Criticism. 1984. Reprint, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2000.
Sasse, Hermann. “Luther and the Word of God.” In Accents in Luther’s Theology, edited by Heino O. Kadai, 123–39. St. Louis: Concordia, 1967.
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. “The Hermeneutics: Outline of the 1819 Lectures.” In Hermeneutics Tradition from Ast to Ricoeur, edited by Gayle L. Ormiston and Alan D. Schrift, 119–37. Intersections. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990.
Shelton, Larry. “Martin Luther’s Concept of Biblical Interpretation in Historical Perspective.” ThD diss., Fuller Theological Seminary, 1974.
Shultz, Werner. “The Problem of Hermeneutics in Current Continental Philosophy and Theology.” Luther’s World 6 (1959) 38–53.
Stulman, Louis. Jeremiah. Abingdon Old Testament Commentaries. Nashville: Abing-don, 2005.
Sundberg, Albert C. “The Canon and the Christian Doctrine of Inspiration.” Interpre-tation 29 (1966) 352–71.
———. “The Protestant Old Testament Canon: Should it Be Re-examined?” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 28 (1966) 194–203.
Vanhoozer, Kevin. “Language, Literature, Hermeneutics, and Biblical Theology: What’s Theological about a Theological Dictionary.” In New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, 197–216, edited by Moisés Silva. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999.
Waltke, Bruce K. An Old Testament Theology: An Exegetical, Canonical, and Thematic Approach. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007.
Wellhausen, Julius. Prolegomena to the History of Israel. New York: Meridian, 1957.
Wilson, Derek. “The Luther Legacy.” History Today 57 (2007) 34–39.
94. Schleiermacher, “The Hermeneutics,” 85–100; see also McLean Biblical Interpretation, 44–50.
95. Fiorenza, “Method in Women’s Studies,” 207.
96. Ricoeur, “Toward a Hermeneutic Idea,” 35.
97. Archer, A Pentecostal Hermeneutic, 180.
98. Darr, “Glorified in the Presence of Kings,” 63.
99. Phan, “Method in Liberation Theologies,” 54; and Gadamer, Truth and Method, 146.
100. Vanhoozer, “Language, Literature,” 27.
101. Bray, Biblical Interpretation, 77.
102. Bray, Biblical Interpretation, 95–96.
103. See, for example, Sasse, “Luther and the Word of God,” 50–72. See also Cameron who observes that it was Martin Luther who led biblical hermeneutics in a new direction with his sola scriptura principle, The European Reformation,136–37.
104. Wood, Captive to the Word, 405).
105. Sasse, “Luther and the Word of God,” 58.
106. Luther, Luther’s Works, vol. 26, Lectures on Galatians, 58.
107. Muller and Thompson, “The Significance of Pre-Critical Exegesis,” 335–42. This principle presupposes scriptural harmony, although Luther was quick to acknowledge the existence of textual problems in biblical interpretation. Luther, nonetheless, argued that textual problems did not endanger the sensus plenior of Scripture which constituted
