to learn something new, this is a task you will repeat hundreds if not thousands of times throughout your work career. This task is part of being an educated person. New procedures will be implemented, a new type of software will be installed, a new gadget will be invented, a new edition of a publication manual will be written—and your task will be to figure it all out. An inherent love of learning and taking on new challenges is an attitude that will serve you well with your future employers, whoever they may be. So, the ability to learn how to write capably in APA Style demonstrates a competence you have that others may not share; in fact, you might know fellow students who pick classes with the least amount of writing. If you develop a skill in an area others systematically avoid, you inevitably make yourself more marketable.
The ability to pay attention to detail, particularly in regard to APA format, can help separate the good from the great. In fact, in a study by Gardner (2007) on the reasons new collegiate hires get fired, failure to pay attention to details is one of the top reasons reported. If you can handle both the big picture and the minute details simultaneously, that is a gift. These gifts can be developed with practice. Practice may not make perfect, but practice allows one to get better and closer to perfect. You have to study, you have to learn from mistakes, and you have to be willing to make the mistakes to maximize your learning ability; obviously, you need to be willing to attempt the task numerous times to gain these experiences. Paying attention to the details can make the difference between earning an A or a B in a course. You may not like the details or how picky and arbitrary they seem, but knowing the rules (and knowing those occasions when you can break the rules) is invaluable. Plus, as you will read in this book, those seemingly “picky” rules can be very helpful to practicing robust science.
Keep in mind that these rules are not just in place for students learning to write. We have some evidence to support the fact that psychologists (including your professors) must also play by the same rules. Brewer et al. (2001) reported that in a survey of journal editors in psychology, 39% of the editors responding indicated that they had rejected an article submitted for publication solely because the writing did not adhere to APA Style and format. These rules are the same rules scientists play by, and, clearly, the penalties for not following the rules can be harsh for faculty and students alike.
Write for Your Specific Audience: Term Papers Versus Formal Research Papers
Ultimately, we all have to play by the rules. Unfortunately, the rules are often a moving target. Have you heard the variation on the Golden Rule—those who have the gold make the rules? In this case, your audience makes the rules for your writing, and your audience (your instructor) may not always be clear about expectations, which means you have to be. Although there are many excellent, skilled, caring instructors out there (we know many of them and salute them all), not all pay as much attention to the assignment design as they could. For example, an instructor may give a writing assignment, like the one in the box below, thinking the instructions are perfectly clear. But see how many questions we have after reading the “assignment.”
Before class next week, I want you to pick a topic in psychology and write a research paper about your topic. Be sure to use evidence to support your position. Make sure you complete the following:
1 Write in APA format.
2 Your paper must be 5 to 7 pages in length.
3 To save paper, use single spacing.
4 Use reference citations in the text of your paper to support any claims you make.
The paper is due on Thursday, and here it is Wednesday night (though we do not recommend waiting until the night before); you sit down to write your paper—no problem? Take a closer look at this assignment; it is wide open and does not provide enough detail for you to be confident about what your audience (your instructor) wants. The instruction “write in APA format” is vague at best, especially because it is contradicted by the third point in the assignment; APA format uses double-spacing in the text. Does this instructor want a title page? An abstract (probably not)? A references page? Do the title page and the references page “count” toward the five- to seven-page requirement? Are direct quotations OK? Are a minimum number of references required? Can you use all kinds of reference materials or just refereed journal articles?
First, an important point: We hope you know that it pays to start the writing process earlier. Not only would you have more time to get clarification on the assignment; you would have time to write more than one draft, something that contributes to higher-quality papers (Landrum, 2012). Additionally, Gurung (2009) showed that students who start assignments earlier do better in class.
A basic tenet of any type of writing is this: Write for your audience. In most cases now, your audience is your instructor. You need to know what your instructor wants, even if the instructor thinks the instructions are clear. You need to know the questions to ask so you can get the answers you need to succeed. This book will help you identify which questions to ask, and when you get the answers, we will give you specific tips on how to do well on the major parts of your writing assignments, whether they are term papers or research papers.
So what would a research paper look like? A research paper, especially in psychology (as in an experimental paper), is typically scripted; you are likely to have specific subsections, such as a Method section and a Results section, and many other details to attend to. A research paper is likely to employ APA Style and most, if not all, components of APA format. Even though APA Style and format provide particulars about how to write your paper, what you will discover is that different instructors have different expectations about style and format; attention to detail will be of ultimate importance to some, and others may not care at all. You cannot use a one-size-fits-all approach and expect to be consistently successful in your coursework. You may need to change your writing approach to fit both the assignment and the instructor; in fact, your instructor’s expectations during a semester may change as well. (We know—that can be frustrating.) Do not be shy. Ask questions. If you are brave, point out inconsistencies, pay attention to details, and work to meet the needs of your audience. If you can conquer these lessons as an undergraduate student, these skills and abilities will serve you well beyond graduation.
2 Your Visual Table of Contents QuickFinder
Have you ever had the challenge of looking up a word in the dictionary that you were not sure you knew how to spell? In a similar vein, you might not know you need help in fixing an anthropomorphism problem if you do not know what an anthropomorphism error is. You cannot search for how to include a part of your paper or how to follow a certain rule if you do not even know that part of the paper or that rule exists. Consequently, we designed a “visual table of contents” for you in this chapter, where we show you a complete sample research paper. Rather than give you tips about it and suggestions for avoiding mistakes (which we will do in Chapter 19), in this chapter, we use the sample paper as a visual organizer. Not sure how to cite a reference in text? Find an example of what you are trying to do in the sample paper, and then follow the QuickFinder guide bubbles that will point you to the chapter and page in this book where you can find help.
By the way, this is a real student paper—and note that we are presenting it to be formatted as a student paper. (When papers are submitted as manuscripts to journals to be considered for publication, the formatting of the first page is different for a professional title page.) Parts of it have been modified from the original, but this is meant to be a realistic example of student work. Is it a perfect paper? No (and Stephen is OK with that). Will you be able to find errors or mistakes in the paper? Probably. We use this paper as a visual guide, not as an example of perfection. The point is not to look for errors but to identify easily where in this guide we discuss the different parts of a paper. So do not use this paper as a
