selected; the name and address of, and the amount distributed to, each recipient; any relationship between a recipient and directors, officers, and/or key employees of, or substantial contributors to, the charitable organization; and the composition of the selection committee approving the assistance.
With respect to short-term emergency aid, the IRS guidelines recognize that charities proving that type of assistance are only expected to maintain records showing the type of assistance provided; the criteria for disbursing assistance; the date, place, and estimated number of victims assisted; the charitable purpose intended to be accomplished; and the cost of the aid. By contrast, organizations that are distributing longer-term assistance are required to keep the more detailed records.
The IRS guidance differentiates among employer-sponsored programs utilizing public charities,240 donor-advised funds,241 and private foundations.242
Charitable Giving Considerations. It is common for a for-profit corporation with a large number of employees to have or otherwise participate in a program, administered by a separate organization, by which the employees are provided financial assistance, in the form of gifts and/or loans, in times of temporary extreme hardship due to circumstances such as natural disasters. The IRS has struggled with the tax law aspects of this over the years, ruling on occasion that these organizations are tax-exempt charitable entities, with the private benefit to the employer incidental, and on other occasions that these entities cannot qualify for exemption because the private benefit to the employer is more than insubstantial. Also, if the separate organization is a private foundation,243 the IRS has on occasion taken the position that the provision of this type of assistance can amount to self-dealing and the making of taxable expenditures.244 Another issue is whether contributions to an organization administering this type of program, often made by the corporation's employees, are deductible as charitable gifts.
In one instance, the IRS ruled that contributions made to such an entity constituted deductible gifts.245 The employer was a large corporation engaged in retail sales worldwide, with many employees. The principal activity of a public charity, not controlled by the employer, was the making of gifts or loans to employees (and their dependents) of the corporation and its subsidiaries who were in demonstrated need. The IRS was of the view that the class of eligible recipients was sufficiently broad to constitute a charitable class.246 (About 5 percent of the employees held salaried management-level positions.) The assistance was provided in cases of “unexpected temporary extreme financial hardship.”
Selection of aid recipients was based on objective criteria and demonstration of need, and was made by an independent selection committee or under adequate substitute procedures. The charitable organization was expected to be principally funded by the corporation's employees; contributions could be made by means of an automatic payroll deduction system. The corporation did not reimburse or otherwise compensate its employees for contributions made to the charity, nor did it require the making of gifts or participation in the payroll deduction plan as a condition of employment. The corporation did not charge the charity for any of its services pursuant to the payroll plan. In this situation, the IRS was of the view that charitable purposes were primarily being furthered, that the benefit to the employer was no more than insubstantial, and that contributions to the charitable organization were, as noted, deductible gifts.247
In another instance, this type of a program was established by a public charity as a fund within it for the benefit of its employees who required emergency services because they had become financially needy or suffered economic hardship due to accident, loss, or disaster.248 Again, the IRS ruled that gifts to the fund qualified for the charitable contribution deduction.
(m) Mandatory Payments
The concept of the mandatory contribution has an oxymoronic ring to it, and for good reason, in that deductible charitable contributions are generally required to be voluntary.249 Yet there are transfers to charitable organizations that are mandated by law, court order, contract, or even the charitable entity itself.250 Intermixed with this topic is another general rule, which is that deductible contributions are often expected to be supported with donative intent.251
An illustration of a mandatory payment to a charitable entity was the dedication of a parcel of land by an individual to a county for use as a public street; the transfer was disallowed as a charitable contribution because the individual was obligated by contract to sell the land to a church.252 Similarly, an individual was not allowed to deduct a sum paid to fill a gully in a city street, inasmuch as the payment was made in compliance with an order issued by the city.253 Likewise, a payment made to a tax-exempt retirement home to reserve a room for the payor or a relative of the payor was not a deductible charitable gift.254 Further, a seller of a home in conjunction with a down payment assistance program conducted by a nonprofit organization, who was obligated to make a “contribution” to the organization in an amount equal to the down payment grant provided by the organization to the purchaser of the home, was advised by the IRS that payment was a fee for service and not a deductible contribution.255 Moreover, payments made by a company to various public charities in order to comply with rules of a governmental entity, where failure to make the payments could jeopardize the company's continued business operations, were ruled by the IRS to not be deductible as charitable gifts.256 A court ruled that a transaction “bears the classic feature of a quid pro quo exchange,” where a grant of an easement (claimed as a gift) was required to enable the “donors” to obtain permission from a county to sell their development rights with respect to the underlying property.257
Further still, a donor of a façade easement was not allowed a charitable deduction for a fee paid to the donee public charity because it was cast by the trial court as a quid pro quo payment; the return benefit was said to be the value of the assistance provided by the donee to the donor in facilitation of the contribution.258 This decision was reversed, with the appellate court holding that the charity did not provide the donor with anything of value in return for her money gift.259 The court saw the cash gift as an endowment of the maintenance of the easement, with the two gifts constituting an “unrequited contribution.”260 The court said that the donor's desire to obtain tax deductions for her gifts did not involve anything provided by the donee. As the court stated, if the “motivation to receive a tax benefit deprived a gift of its charitable nature . . . , virtually no charitable gifts would be deductible.”
