Selenium Contamination in Water. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Selenium Contamination in Water - Группа авторов страница 22
![Selenium Contamination in Water - Группа авторов Selenium Contamination in Water - Группа авторов](/cover_pre950306.jpg)
(where CH2O represents generic organic carbon compound).
This process provides an efficient way for detoxification of environment as insoluble Se and organic‐Se compounds are less toxic than soluble Se oxyanions (Bailey et al. 2012). Appropriate electron (e−) donor substances such as sugars, alcohols, humic substances, organic acids and hydrogen (Bailey et al. 2012; Korom 1992) have been used by Se‐reducing microorganisms. Se oxyanions are behaved as electron (e−) acceptor in dissimilatory reduction reactions. Dissimilatory reduction process contributes significantly to detoxification of a seleniferous environment as compared to the assimilatory reduction process. Dissimilatory reduction offers a cost‐effective way for environmental remediation and therefore attracts the attention of researchers. Eswayah et al. (2016) have reviewed in detail the microbial transformations of unlike forms of Se, assimilation, dissimilation reduction process, anaerobic respiration of several microorganisms supported by dissimilatory reduction, formation of nanoparticulate elemental selenium, etc. Retention of Se by cattle manure has also been reported by Ogaard et al. (2006). In the batch studies the group observed that on addition of cattle manure there is a decrease in adsorption of both selenite and selenate to a loam soil, since manure contains organic acids of low molecular weight such as acetic, formic, and oxalic acids which contend with Se for available sorption sites (Ogaard 1996).
2.5 Interaction of Selenium with Clay Mineral
In soil the presence of clay and minerals plays a vital role in sorption and desorption process of Se species and thus affect their bioavailability. The content of Se is better in soil with elevated clay content than in sandy soil (Gissel‐Nielsen 1975). Gissel‐Nielsen (1971) has studied the effect of texture and pH value on Se uptake from sandy and loamy soils. Caolinite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4), a clay mineral, is formed by octahedral sheets of alumina having a positive charge at their edges, that serve as binding sites for Se (Bar‐Yosef and Meek 1987). Several other minerals such as Fe/Al oxyhydroxides, manganese oxide, and hydroxyapatite (Monteil‐Rivera et al. 2000) are also present in the soils (Eich‐Greatorex et al. 2010); the presence of such minerals varies from place to place. The available binding sites for these minerals, i.e. positively or negatively charged, are dependent on reaction conditions, e.g. in alkaline and acidic reaction conditions the charge on aluminum hydroxide minerals is negative and positive, respectively. Over the surfaces of these minerals selenate and selenite get sorbed under acidic soil conditions (Balistrieri and Chao 1990). However, selenate has lesser adsorption capacity and more bioavailable than selenite. The presence of citric and oxalic acid affect the sorption of selenate and selenite. The presence of acetic and formic acids facilitates the adsorption of selenate but does not affect the adsorption of selenite (Dynes and Huang 1997; Wijnja and Schulthess 2000). This kind of behavior of selenate and selenite can be elucidated by the formation of an outer‐sphere complex of selenate which bounds with non‐specific anion exchange sites with minerals, whereas selenite forms an inner‐sphere complex by ligand exchange method (i.e. form covalent bonds) that is irreversible in nature (Peak and Sparks 2002). Similar to selenate and selenite, acetic and formic acids form outer‐sphere complexes, whereas citric and oxalic acids form inner‐sphere complexes at the mineral‐water interface (Dynes and Huang 1997; Wijnja and Schulthess 2000). Besides this, sorption of selenite in the presence of fulvic acids has no effect on aluminum oxides (Zuyi et al. 2000), but promotes the adsorption on amorphous iron oxides (Tam et al. 1995).
The adsorption process is affected by the existence of contending ions such as phosphate (PO43−) and sulfate (SO42−), and the nature of bonding formed between the competing ions has also governed the mobility of Se species by affecting their sorption in soil and water bodies. In soil, these species are mainly added through agricultural products including gypsum‐ and phosphate‐rich fertilizers. For Japanese soils it has been reported that sorption of Se decreases in the presence of PO43− ion; for selenite this effect is more pronounced than for selenate. Therefore, in phosphate‐rich areas selenite is more bioavailable (Nakamaru et al. 2006; Nakamaru and Sekine 2008) whereas for sulfate‐rich soil selenate is more available for biota. This kind of behavior of selenite and selenate is due to their chemical similarities to phosphate (Eich‐Greatorex et al. 2010) and sulfate, respectively. This supports the study of Nakamaru and Sekine (2008), i.e. an increase in concentration of sulfate ions does not change selenite sorption. To reduce the selanate sorption for plants it has been reported that BaCl2 is more effective than sulfate ions as it forms an insoluble BaSeO4 compound (Mikkelsen et al. 1989). Further, in neutral medium Se uptake decreased in the presence of sulfate (Williams and Thoronton 1972), whereas increased Se uptake has been observed in an alkaline medium (Carter et al. 1972).
Singh (1979) has studied the consequences of supplementary Se and P on arid matters and also examined the chemical composition of Brassicajuncea Cos, in a greenhouse test. The study reveals that when Se is added without and with P there is a manifold improvement in the concentration of Se in plants with respect to control. Se uptake by Trifolium alexandrinum has increased effectively for all variants of Se on addition of 50 and 100 ppm P. The effect is also dependent on the presence of auxiliary ions in fertilizers (Khattak et al. 1991) such as superphosphate (Ca(H2PO4)2) (Fleming 1962), which reduces the Se uptake that may be due to the existence of competing SO42− ions (component of superphosphate). Carter et al. (1972) have proposed that phosphate can work in two ways: in the presence of Se phosphate competes with Se at sorption sites, or promotes the cell division of plant roots and thus increases Se uptake.
2.6 Conclusion
Selenium is an essentio‐toxin element with chemistry similar to that of sulfur. Several Se species are available in nature and are distributed widely in soil and water. Physico‐chemical properties including originating rocks, pH, redox potential, organic matters, microorganisms, mineral, properties of clay, competing ions, etc. are responsible for the incidence of the different Se species in soils. In soil the main sources of Se are seleniferous rocks, burning of fossil fuels, disposal of Se‐containing industrial waste and addition of agricultural products, etc. These sources are responsible for the accumulation of different chemical species of Se in soil. Depending upon Se concentration in soil can be divided into toxic, moderate, and deficient levels which may exist side by side. Bioavailability of Se in the plants and crops supported by soil depends on local environmental factors, e.g. in acidic pH range (4.5–6.5), rich in OM, presence of strongly reducing species and also in the region of low rainfall, non‐toxic seleniferous soil predominates, i.e. insoluble selenide (‐II) and elemental Se(0) forms are present majorly. In a solution of well‐aerated alkaline soil selenate and selenite are the most soluble species but the presence of such species may change. In humid conditions the occurrence of accumulated zones of minerals renders the bioavailability of Se to plants. The interaction of Se species with OM including fulvic acid is more bioavailable than humic acid because interaction of Se species with humic acid immobilizes Se and therefore becomes less bioavailable. Sorption and desorption process in the presence of clay content, OM and minerals