Watts, R.K. (1977). Point defects in Crystals. New York: John Wiley & Sons.5 5 Yen, W.M. and Selzer, P.M. (eds.) (1981). Laser Spectroscopy of Solids. New York: Springer‐Verlag.
6 6 Sild, O. and Haller, K. (eds.) (1988). Zero Phonon Lines and Spectral Hole Burning In Spectroscopy and Photochemistry. New York: Springer‐Verlag.
7 7 Vij, D.R. (ed.) (1998). Luminescence of Solids. New York: Plenum Press.
8 8 Franck, E.G. and Dymond, E.G. (1926). Trans. Faraday Soc. 21: 536.
9 9 Condon, E.U. (1928). Phys. Rev. 32: 858.
10 10 Cannas, M. (1998). Point defects in amorphous SiO2: optical activity in the visible, UV and vacuum‐UV spectral regions. PhD thesis, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche ed Astronomiche, Università di Palermo, Italy.
11 11 Skuja, L. (2000). Defects in SiO2 and Related Dielectrics: Science and Technology (eds. G. Pacchioni, L. Skuja and D.L. Griscom). USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12 12 Huang, K. and Rhys, A. (1950). Proc. Roy. Soc. A204: 406.
13 13 Skuja, L., Hirano, M., Hosono, H., and Kajihara, K. (2005). Phys. Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) 2: 15.
14 14 Girard, S., Alessi, A., Richard, N. et al. (2019). Rev. Phys. 4: 100032.
15 15 Vaccaro, L., Morana, A., Radzig, V., and Cannas, M. (2011). J. Phys. Chem. C 115: 19476.
16 16 Bonacchi, S., Genovese, D., Juris, R. et al. (2011). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50: 4056.
17 17 Rimola, A., Costa, D., Sodupe, M. et al. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113: 4216.
18 18 Carbonaro, C., Corpino, R., Ricci, P. et al. (2014). J. Phys. Chem. C 118: 26219.
19 19 Tarpani, L., Ruhlandt, D., Latterini, L. et al. (2016). Nano Lett. 16: 4312.
20 20 Spallino, L., Spera, M., Vaccaro, L. et al. (2014). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16: 22028.
21 21 Radzig, V.A. (2000). Defects in SiO2 and Related Dielectrics: Science and Technology. In: (eds. G. Pacchioni, L. Skuja and D.L. Griscom). USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22 22 Radzig, V.A. (2001). Chem. Phys. Rep. 19: 469.
23 23 Vaccaro, L., Cannas, M., Radzig, V., and Boscaino, R. (2008). Phys. Rev. B 78: 075421.
24 24 Vaccaro, L., Cannas, M., and Radzig, V. (2008). Phys. Rev. B 78: 233408.
25 25 Vaccaro, L., Cannas, M., and Radzig, V. (2009). J. Non Cryst. Solids 355: 1020.
26 26 Suzuki, T., Skuja, L., Kajihara, K. et al. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 90: 186404.
27 27 Bakos, T., Rashkeev, S.N., and Pantelides, S.T. (2004). Phys. Rev. B 70: 075203.
28 28 Giordano, L., Sushko, P.V., Pacchioni, G., and Shluger, A.L. (2007). Phys. Rev. B 75: 024109.
29 29 Vaccaro, L. and Cannas, M. (2010). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23: 235801.
30 30 Hobbs, L.W. and Yuan, X. (2000). Defects in SiO2 and Related Dielectrics: Science and Technology (eds. G. Pacchioni, L. Skuja and D.L. Griscom). USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31 31 Mauri, F., Pasquarello, A., Pfrommer, B.G. et al. (2000). Phys. Rev. B 62: R4786.
3 Ultrafast Optical Spectroscopies
Alice Sciortino and Fabrizio Messina
Department of Physics and Chemistry – Emilio Segrè, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
3.1 Femtosecond Spectroscopy: An Overview
Traditional steady state spectroscopies, addressed in Chapter 1 of this book, are essential tools to characterize a physicochemical system through the extensive mapping of its energy landscape and transitions. However, these classical methods cannot capture the dynamical aspects driving the response of the system after an initial perturbation. These aspects can only be addressed by time‐resolved spectroscopic techniques, which are methods capable of following in time the evolution of a physicochemical system, after it has been initially brought out of equilibrium by a defined stimulus, such as photon absorption. Indeed, a thorough understanding of these dynamics, as they unravel in time, is often crucial to fully elucidate the behavior of a system of physical, chemical, or biological interest.
Photoexcitation of any physical system triggers a complex sequence of phenomena occurring over many temporal orders of magnitude after initial photon absorption, and responsible for the ultimate outcome of the photocycle. The primary and most fundamental dynamics, however, usually occur on picosecond (1 ps = 10−12 s) or femtosecond (1 fs = 10−15 s) timescales for many well‐known processes of fundamental interest in photophysics and photochemistry [1]. In particular, it can be argued that femtoseconds are the “fundamental” timescale for any physicochemical process involving short‐range atomic rearrangements, such as chemical reactions or molecular relaxations, because the vibrational period of nuclei always fall in the femtosecond time range (∼10 fs for the OH vibration). Thereby, it is evident that very fast, or rather “ultrafast,” spectroscopic techniques are compulsory to investigate these types of phenomena.
This chapter addresses a variety of experimental methods usually referred to as ultrafast or femtosecond spectroscopies. These techniques are capable of time resolutions reaching a few femtoseconds, which are essential to reconstruct in detail the course of events initiated by photoexcitation, achieving a comprehensive understanding of the photocycle of any physical system. Examples of typical phenomena which are addressed by femtosecond methods are molecular energy relaxations, such as internal conversion or intersystem crossing [2], solvation dynamics, electron and energy transfer events [3–5], fluorescence quenching [5], dynamics of charge carriers and excitons in semiconductors [6], and photochemical reactions [7]. For these reasons, femtosecond techniques are today well‐established and considered a fundamental tool in spectroscopy.
For example, whenever a molecule in solution phase is electronically excited by UV or VIS light, the surrounding solvent responds to the electronic redistribution within the molecule by a series of short‐ and long‐range rearrangements, collectively named solvation dynamics. These dynamics typically occur on femtosecond and picosecond timescales [3, 4] and are a key component of the behavior of any system in solution phase. As another example, when charge carriers in a bulk or nano‐sized semiconductor are promoted to a high energy state by photon absorption, their successive relaxation involves processes, such as electron–electron or electron–phonon scattering, or Auger recombination, which are of fundamental importance and equally take place on such, ultrafast, timescales [8, 9].
The general idea behind most femtosecond spectroscopies is to use at least two, or more, light pulses with very short time durations to follow in real time the undergoing dynamics. One of the pulses, for example, is resonant to an electronic transition of the investigated system, and its absorption by the system causes an injection of energy and a quasi‐instantaneous redistribution of the electronic charge. Then, the successive dynamics are studied by taking spectroscopic snapshots of the excited systems at variable delays, by the use of a second light pulse. This can be done by using one of several possible spectroscopic observables, capable of retrieving different types of information,
