Status Report: Microsoft Ignite216
3.2 Change Request: Microsoft Ignite218
3.3 Change Log: Microsoft Ignite220
3.4 Decision Log: Microsoft Ignite222
3.5 Quality Audit: Microsoft Ignite224
3.6 Team Directory: Microsoft Ignite227
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Microsoft Ignite229
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Microsoft Ignite231
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Microsoft Ignite233
3.10 Issue Log: Microsoft Ignite235
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Microsoft Ignite237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Microsoft Ignite239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Microsoft Ignite241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Microsoft Ignite243
4.4 Risk Audit: Microsoft Ignite245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Microsoft Ignite247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Microsoft Ignite249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Microsoft Ignite251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Microsoft Ignite253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Microsoft Ignite255
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Microsoft Ignite257
5.4 Lessons Learned: Microsoft Ignite259
Index261
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
2. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
3. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
4. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
5. Which information does the Microsoft Ignite business case need to include?
<--- Score
6. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
7. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
8. What Microsoft Ignite problem should be solved?
<--- Score
9. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
10. Do you know what you need to know about Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
11. When a Microsoft Ignite manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
12. What would happen if Microsoft Ignite weren’t done?
<--- Score
13. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
14. Have you identified your Microsoft Ignite key performance indicators?
<--- Score
15. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
16. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Microsoft Ignite team, Microsoft Ignite itself?
<--- Score
17. Did you miss any major Microsoft Ignite issues?
<--- Score
18. What Microsoft Ignite coordination do you need?
<--- Score
19. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
20. Are there Microsoft Ignite problems defined?
<--- Score
21. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
22. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
23. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
24. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
25. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
26. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
27. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
28. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Microsoft Ignite as an effective investment?
<--- Score
29. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
30. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<---
