Score
62. What are (control) requirements for Microsoft Ignite Information?
<--- Score
63. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
64. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
65. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
66. What is the definition of Microsoft Ignite excellence?
<--- Score
67. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
68. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
69. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
70. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
71. What are the Microsoft Ignite tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
72. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
73. Will a Microsoft Ignite production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
74. What is the scope of Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
75. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
76. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Microsoft Ignite results are met?
<--- Score
77. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
78. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
79. What is the context?
<--- Score
80. What Microsoft Ignite requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
81. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
82. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
83. Are the Microsoft Ignite requirements testable?
<--- Score
84. Are accountability and ownership for Microsoft Ignite clearly defined?
<--- Score
85. Is the Microsoft Ignite scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
86. How do you gather Microsoft Ignite requirements?
<--- Score
87. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
88. How would you define Microsoft Ignite leadership?
<--- Score
89. Have all basic functions of Microsoft Ignite been defined?
<--- Score
90. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
91. Who is gathering Microsoft Ignite information?
<--- Score
92. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
93. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
94. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
95. Who approved the Microsoft Ignite scope?
<--- Score
96. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
97. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
98. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
99. Is there a critical path to deliver Microsoft Ignite results?
<--- Score
100. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Microsoft Ignite leverage and how?
<--- Score
101. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
102. Is Microsoft Ignite linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
103. Is the scope of Microsoft Ignite defined?
<--- Score
104. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
105. Will team members perform Microsoft Ignite work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
106. Scope of sensitive information?
<---
