Score
107. Is there a clear Microsoft Ignite case definition?
<--- Score
108. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
109. How does the Microsoft Ignite manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Microsoft Ignite study?
<--- Score
112. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
113. Is special Microsoft Ignite user knowledge required?
<--- Score
114. What gets examined?
<--- Score
115. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
116. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
117. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Microsoft Ignite? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
118. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
119. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
120. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
121. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
122. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Microsoft Ignite changes?
<--- Score
123. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
124. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
125. Is there any additional Microsoft Ignite definition of success?
<--- Score
126. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
127. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
128. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
129. What happens if Microsoft Ignite’s scope changes?
<--- Score
130. Has the Microsoft Ignite work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
131. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Microsoft Ignite goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
132. How will the Microsoft Ignite team and the group measure complete success of Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
133. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
134. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
135. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
136. Who are the Microsoft Ignite improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Microsoft Ignite Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
2. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
3. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
4. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
5. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
6. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
7. What are the operational costs after Microsoft Ignite deployment?
<--- Score
8. Among the Microsoft Ignite product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
9. How frequently do you track Microsoft Ignite measures?
