Score
31. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Microsoft Ignite leader?
<--- Score
32. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
33. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
34. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
35. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
36. Who needs to know about Microsoft Ignite?
<--- Score
37. Do you recognize Microsoft Ignite achievements?
<--- Score
38. Are there recognized Microsoft Ignite problems?
<--- Score
39. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
40. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Microsoft Ignite? In other words, what are the risks, if Microsoft Ignite does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
41. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
42. Does Microsoft Ignite create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
43. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
44. What situation(s) led to this Microsoft Ignite Self Assessment?
<--- Score
45. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
46. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
47. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
48. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
49. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
50. Do you need to avoid or amend any Microsoft Ignite activities?
<--- Score
51. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
52. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
53. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
54. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
55. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Microsoft Ignite project?
<--- Score
56. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
57. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
58. What information do users need?
<--- Score
59. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Microsoft Ignite will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
60. What is the extent or complexity of the Microsoft Ignite problem?
<--- Score
61. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
62. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
63. Do you need to update on-premise Exchange or Active Directory services before migrating?
<--- Score
64. For your Microsoft Ignite project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
65. Consider your own Microsoft Ignite project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
66. Who should resolve the Microsoft Ignite issues?
<--- Score
67. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
68. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
69. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
70. Think about the people you identified for your Microsoft Ignite project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
71. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Microsoft Ignite delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
72. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
73. What are your needs in relation to Microsoft Ignite skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
74.
