is clearly defined’.
There are two ways in which you can choose to interpret this statement;
1.how aware are you that the answer to the question is clearly defined
2.for more in-depth analysis you can choose to gather evidence and confirm the answer to the question. This obviously will take more time, most Self-Assessment users opt for the first way to interpret the question and dig deeper later on based on the outcome of the overall Self-Assessment.
A score of ‘1’ would mean that the answer is not clear at all, where a ‘5’ would mean the answer is crystal clear and defined. Leave emtpy when the question is not applicable or you don’t want to answer it, you can skip it without affecting your score. Write your score in the space provided.
After you have responded to all the appropriate statements in each section, compute your average score for that section, using the formula provided, and round to the nearest tenth. Then transfer to the corresponding spoke in the Learning Design Scorecard on the second next page of the Self-Assessment.
Your completed Learning Design Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Learning Design areas need attention.
Learning Design
Scorecard Example
Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:
Learning Design
Scorecard
Your Scores:
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:
Table of Contents
About The Art of Service7
Included Resources - how to access7
Purpose of this Self-Assessment9
How to use the Self-Assessment10
Learning Design
Scorecard Example12
Learning Design
Scorecard13
BEGINNING OF THE
SELF-ASSESSMENT:14
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE15
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:26
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:42
CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:57
CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:73
CRITERION #6: CONTROL:89
CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:104
Learning Design and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:128
1.0 Initiating Process Group: Learning Design129
1.1 Project Charter: Learning Design131
1.2 Stakeholder Register: Learning Design133
1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Learning Design134
2.0 Planning Process Group: Learning Design136
2.1 Project Management Plan: Learning Design138
2.2 Scope Management Plan: Learning Design140
2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Learning Design142
2.4 Requirements Documentation: Learning Design144
2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Learning Design146
2.6 Project Scope Statement: Learning Design148
2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Learning Design150
2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Learning Design152
2.9 WBS Dictionary: Learning Design154
2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Learning Design156
2.11 Activity List: Learning Design158
2.12 Activity Attributes: Learning Design160
2.13 Milestone List: Learning Design162
2.14 Network Diagram: Learning Design164
2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Learning Design166
2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Learning Design168
2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Learning Design170
2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Learning Design172
2.19 Project Schedule: Learning Design174
2.20 Cost Management Plan: Learning Design176
2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Learning Design178
2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Learning Design180
2.23 Cost Baseline: Learning Design182
2.24 Quality Management Plan: Learning Design184
2.25 Quality Metrics: Learning Design186
2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Learning Design188
2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Learning Design190
2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Learning Design192
2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Learning Design194
2.30 Communications Management Plan: Learning Design196
2.31 Risk Management Plan: Learning Design198
2.32 Risk Register: Learning Design200
2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Learning Design202
2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Learning Design204
2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Learning Design206
2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Learning Design208
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Learning Design210
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Learning Design212
2.39 Change Management Plan: Learning Design214
3.0 Executing Process Group: Learning Design216
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Learning Design218
3.2
