How are consistent Tree network definitions important?
<--- Score
62. Will team members regularly document their Tree network work?
<--- Score
63. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
64. What Tree network services do you require?
<--- Score
65. How can the value of Tree network be defined?
<--- Score
66. Is Tree network linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
68. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
70. How do you gather Tree network requirements?
<--- Score
71. What sources do you use to gather information for a Tree network study?
<--- Score
72. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
73. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
74. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
75. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
76. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
77. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
78. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
79. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
80. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
81. What was the context?
<--- Score
82. Will a Tree network production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
83. Is the scope of Tree network defined?
<--- Score
84. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
85. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
86. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
87. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
88. Are accountability and ownership for Tree network clearly defined?
<--- Score
89. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
90. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
91. Are the Tree network requirements complete?
<--- Score
92. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
93. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Tree network results?
<--- Score
95. What are the record-keeping requirements of Tree network activities?
<--- Score
96. Has the Tree network work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
97. What is the context?
<--- Score
98. Who approved the Tree network scope?
<--- Score
99. Is the Tree network scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
100. Is there a clear Tree network case definition?
<--- Score
101. What system do you use for gathering Tree network information?
<--- Score
102. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
103. What gets examined?
<--- Score
104. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Tree network results are met?
<--- Score
105. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<---
