style="font-size:15px;"> 106. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
107. What would be the goal or target for a Tree network’s improvement team?
<--- Score
108. When is/was the Tree network start date?
<--- Score
109. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
110. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
111. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
112. What happens if Tree network’s scope changes?
<--- Score
113. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
114. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
115. Have all basic functions of Tree network been defined?
<--- Score
116. Are improvement team members fully trained on Tree network?
<--- Score
117. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
118. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
119. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
120. Who is gathering Tree network information?
<--- Score
121. What is the scope of the Tree network effort?
<--- Score
122. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Tree network? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
123. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Tree network brings?
<--- Score
124. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
125. Is Tree network currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
126. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
127. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
128. Will team members perform Tree network work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
129. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
130. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
131. Who are the Tree network improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
132. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
133. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
134. Is there any additional Tree network definition of success?
<--- Score
135. What are the Tree network tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
136. Is there a Tree network management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
137. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
138. Has a Tree network requirement not been met?
<--- Score
139. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
140. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Tree network Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
2. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
3. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
4. Do you have any cost Tree network limitation requirements?
<---
