Are the Intelligence cycle management requirements testable?
<--- Score
100. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Intelligence cycle management?
<--- Score
101. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
102. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
103. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Intelligence cycle management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
104. Is Intelligence cycle management required?
<--- Score
105. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
106. What would be the goal or target for a Intelligence cycle management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
107. Is the Intelligence cycle management scope manageable?
<--- Score
108. What Intelligence cycle management services do you require?
<--- Score
109. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Intelligence cycle management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
110. Who are the Intelligence cycle management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
111. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
112. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
113. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
114. What happens if Intelligence cycle management’s scope changes?
<--- Score
115. Are accountability and ownership for Intelligence cycle management clearly defined?
<--- Score
116. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
117. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
118. Do you have a Intelligence cycle management success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
119. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
120. Why are you doing Intelligence cycle management and what is the scope?
<--- Score
121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
122. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
123. How can the value of Intelligence cycle management be defined?
<--- Score
124. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
125. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Intelligence cycle management results are met?
<--- Score
126. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
127. Is the scope of Intelligence cycle management defined?
<--- Score
128. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
129. Is there a critical path to deliver Intelligence cycle management results?
<--- Score
130. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
131. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
132. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
133. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
134. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
135. How do you think the partners involved in Intelligence cycle management would have defined success?
<--- Score
136. How have you defined all Intelligence cycle management requirements first?
<--- Score
137. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Intelligence cycle management Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
