Score
55. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
56. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Decentralization of power changes?
<--- Score
57. What is the context?
<--- Score
58. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
59. Are improvement team members fully trained on Decentralization of power?
<--- Score
60. Are accountability and ownership for Decentralization of power clearly defined?
<--- Score
61. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
62. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
63. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Decentralization of power results are met?
<--- Score
64. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. What are (control) requirements for Decentralization of power Information?
<--- Score
66. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
67. What is in scope?
<--- Score
68. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
69. What was the context?
<--- Score
70. What sources do you use to gather information for a Decentralization of power study?
<--- Score
71. Is special Decentralization of power user knowledge required?
<--- Score
72. Who approved the Decentralization of power scope?
<--- Score
73. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
74. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
75. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
76. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
77. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
78. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
79. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
80. Are the Decentralization of power requirements complete?
<--- Score
81. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope?
<--- Score
83. Is there a clear Decentralization of power case definition?
<--- Score
84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
85. What are the record-keeping requirements of Decentralization of power activities?
<--- Score
86. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
87. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
88. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
90. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
91. Will team members perform Decentralization of power work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
92. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
93. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
94. Why are you doing Decentralization of power and what is the scope?
<--- Score
95. Will team members regularly document their Decentralization of power work?
<--- Score
96. What gets examined?
<--- Score
97. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
98. How do you manage changes in Decentralization of power requirements?
