12. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
13. Is special File area network user knowledge required?
<--- Score
14. Has a File area network requirement not been met?
<--- Score
15. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
16. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
17. What is the scope of the File area network effort?
<--- Score
18. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
19. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
20. What are (control) requirements for File area network Information?
<--- Score
21. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
22. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
23. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
24. Is there a critical path to deliver File area network results?
<--- Score
25. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
26. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does File area network leverage and how?
<--- Score
27. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
28. Are the File area network requirements complete?
<--- Score
29. What happens if File area network’s scope changes?
<--- Score
30. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
31. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
32. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
33. Who approved the File area network scope?
<--- Score
34. How would you define File area network leadership?
<--- Score
35. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
36. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
37. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform File area network work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
38. Do you have a File area network success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
39. What sources do you use to gather information for a File area network study?
<--- Score
40. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
41. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
42. Have all basic functions of File area network been defined?
<--- Score
43. Is the File area network scope manageable?
<--- Score
44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to File area network changes?
<--- Score
45. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
46. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
47. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
48. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
49. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
50. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
51. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
52. Is File area network currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
53. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
54. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
55. When is/was the File area network start date?
<--- Score
56. How do you think the partners involved in File area network would have defined success?
<---
