Score
102. How did the Social learning tools manager receive input to the development of a Social learning tools improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
103. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
104. Have all basic functions of Social learning tools been defined?
<--- Score
105. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
106. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Social learning tools goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
107. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
108. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
109. Are the Social learning tools requirements complete?
<--- Score
110. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
111. Do you all define Social learning tools in the same way?
<--- Score
112. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
114. What is the scope of Social learning tools?
<--- Score
115. How do you manage changes in Social learning tools requirements?
<--- Score
116. How do you hand over Social learning tools context?
<--- Score
117. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
118. Who is gathering Social learning tools information?
<--- Score
119. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
120. Is Social learning tools currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
121. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
122. What is the scope?
<--- Score
123. Will team members regularly document their Social learning tools work?
<--- Score
124. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
125. Do you have a Social learning tools success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
127. What system do you use for gathering Social learning tools information?
<--- Score
128. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
129. Are accountability and ownership for Social learning tools clearly defined?
<--- Score
130. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
131. What gets examined?
<--- Score
132. What was the context?
<--- Score
133. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
134. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
135. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Social learning tools results are met?
<--- Score
136. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
137. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
138. What is the context?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Social learning tools Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
2. What are allowable costs?
