Score
59. How do you gather Social learning tools requirements?
<--- Score
60. Are the Social learning tools requirements testable?
<--- Score
61. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
62. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
63. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
64. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
65. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
66. Will a Social learning tools production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
67. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
68. What would be the goal or target for a Social learning tools’s improvement team?
<--- Score
69. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
70. When is/was the Social learning tools start date?
<--- Score
71. Are improvement team members fully trained on Social learning tools?
<--- Score
72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
73. What sources do you use to gather information for a Social learning tools study?
<--- Score
74. Who are the Social learning tools improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
75. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
76. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Social learning tools leverage and how?
<--- Score
77. How will the Social learning tools team and the group measure complete success of Social learning tools?
<--- Score
78. How does the Social learning tools manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. How do you think the partners involved in Social learning tools would have defined success?
<--- Score
80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
81. Is Social learning tools linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
83. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
84. How would you define Social learning tools leadership?
<--- Score
85. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
86. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
87. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
88. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Social learning tools? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
89. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Is there a critical path to deliver Social learning tools results?
<--- Score
91. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
92. Is there any additional Social learning tools definition of success?
<--- Score
93. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
94. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
95. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Social learning tools?
<--- Score
96. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
97. How can the value of Social learning tools be defined?
<--- Score
98. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
99. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
100. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
101. Is there a Social learning tools management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<---
