Does your organization need more Source coding education?
<--- Score
77. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
78. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
79. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
80. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
81. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
82. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
83. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
84. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Source coding project?
<--- Score
85. What are your needs in relation to Source coding skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
86. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
87. How are the Source coding’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
88. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
89. Did you miss any major Source coding issues?
<--- Score
90. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
91. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
92. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Source coding delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
93. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
94. What would happen if Source coding weren’t done?
<--- Score
95. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
96. What Source coding problem should be solved?
<--- Score
97. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
98. What is the extent or complexity of the Source coding problem?
<--- Score
99. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Source coding Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
2. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Source coding? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
3. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
4. How have you defined all Source coding requirements first?
<--- Score
5. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
6. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Source coding?
<--- Score
7. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
8. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Source coding changes?
<--- Score
9. Are the Source coding requirements complete?
<--- Score
10. What sources do you use to gather information for a Source coding study?
<--- Score
11. What is the context?
<--- Score
12. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
13. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
14. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
15. Is there a clear Source coding case definition?
<---
