political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
107. Is Source coding currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
108. Is Source coding linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
109. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
110. What system do you use for gathering Source coding information?
<--- Score
111. What are (control) requirements for Source coding Information?
<--- Score
112. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
113. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
114. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
115. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
116. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
117. Will a Source coding production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
118. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
119. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
120. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
121. Is there a Source coding management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
123. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
124. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
125. How would you define Source coding leadership?
<--- Score
126. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
127. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
128. What Source coding requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
129. Are the Source coding requirements testable?
<--- Score
130. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
131. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
132. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
133. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
134. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Source coding brings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Source coding Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
2. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
3. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
4. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
5. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
6. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
7. What are the Source coding investment costs?
<--- Score
8. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
9. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
10. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
11. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
12.
