Score
52. What are the record-keeping requirements of Quantitative risk assessment activities?
<--- Score
53. When is/was the Quantitative risk assessment start date?
<--- Score
54. How do you manage unclear Quantitative risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
55. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Quantitative risk assessment leverage and how?
<--- Score
56. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
57. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
58. Is the Quantitative risk assessment scope manageable?
<--- Score
59. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
60. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
61. What happens if Quantitative risk assessment’s scope changes?
<--- Score
62. Is Quantitative risk assessment linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
63. What is the scope of Quantitative risk assessment?
<--- Score
64. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
65. Is there any additional Quantitative risk assessment definition of success?
<--- Score
66. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
67. Have all basic functions of Quantitative risk assessment been defined?
<--- Score
68. What Quantitative risk assessment requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
69. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Are accountability and ownership for Quantitative risk assessment clearly defined?
<--- Score
72. Do you all define Quantitative risk assessment in the same way?
<--- Score
73. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
74. What is the scope?
<--- Score
75. Is the Quantitative risk assessment scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
76. How does the Quantitative risk assessment manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
77. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
78. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
79. Is the scope of Quantitative risk assessment defined?
<--- Score
80. How have you defined all Quantitative risk assessment requirements first?
<--- Score
81. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
82. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
83. What are (control) requirements for Quantitative risk assessment Information?
<--- Score
84. How do you gather Quantitative risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
85. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Quantitative risk assessment study?
<--- Score
87. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
88. Are the Quantitative risk assessment requirements complete?
<--- Score
89. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
90. How do you hand over Quantitative risk assessment context?
<--- Score
91. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
92. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
93. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
94. Is there a Quantitative risk assessment management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
95. What specifically is the problem? Where does
