When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
96. Who are the Quantitative risk assessment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
97. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
98. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
99. How do you manage changes in Quantitative risk assessment requirements?
<--- Score
100. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Quantitative risk assessment? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
101. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
102. What are the Quantitative risk assessment use cases?
<--- Score
103. Is Quantitative risk assessment currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
104. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
105. What would be the goal or target for a Quantitative risk assessment’s improvement team?
<--- Score
106. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
107. What is the scope of the Quantitative risk assessment work?
<--- Score
108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
109. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
110. Do you have a Quantitative risk assessment success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
111. What is the context?
<--- Score
112. How can the value of Quantitative risk assessment be defined?
<--- Score
113. What are the Quantitative risk assessment tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
114. Is there a clear Quantitative risk assessment case definition?
<--- Score
115. Is Quantitative risk assessment required?
<--- Score
116. Why are you doing Quantitative risk assessment and what is the scope?
<--- Score
117. What was the context?
<--- Score
118. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
119. Has the Quantitative risk assessment work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
120. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
121. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
122. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
123. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
124. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
125. How do you think the partners involved in Quantitative risk assessment would have defined success?
<--- Score
126. What system do you use for gathering Quantitative risk assessment information?
<--- Score
127. How will the Quantitative risk assessment team and the group measure complete success of Quantitative risk assessment?
<--- Score
128. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
129. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
130. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
131. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
132. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
133. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Quantitative risk assessment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2
