Change Management Plan: Information Logistics213
3.0 Executing Process Group: Information Logistics215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Information Logistics217
3.2 Change Request: Information Logistics219
3.3 Change Log: Information Logistics221
3.4 Decision Log: Information Logistics223
3.5 Quality Audit: Information Logistics225
3.6 Team Directory: Information Logistics228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Information Logistics230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Information Logistics232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Information Logistics235
3.10 Issue Log: Information Logistics237
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Information Logistics239
4.1 Project Performance Report: Information Logistics241
4.2 Variance Analysis: Information Logistics243
4.3 Earned Value Status: Information Logistics245
4.4 Risk Audit: Information Logistics247
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Information Logistics249
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Information Logistics251
5.0 Closing Process Group: Information Logistics253
5.1 Procurement Audit: Information Logistics255
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Information Logistics257
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Information Logistics259
5.4 Lessons Learned: Information Logistics261
Index263
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
2. What are the expected benefits of Information logistics to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
3. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
4. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
5. Will Information logistics deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
6. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
7. What are your needs in relation to Information logistics skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
8. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
9. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
10. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Information logistics will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
11. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
12. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
13. Do you need to avoid or amend any Information logistics activities?
<--- Score
14. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
15. Have you identified your Information logistics key performance indicators?
<--- Score
16. Do you know what you need to know about Information logistics?
<--- Score
17. Does your organization need more Information logistics education?
<--- Score
18. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
19. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
20. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
21. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
22. Are there recognized Information logistics problems?
<--- Score
23. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Information logistics as an effective investment?
<--- Score
24. How do you assess your Information logistics workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
25. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
26. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
27. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Information logistics research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
28. Are there
