<--- Score
29. How did the Risk report manager receive input to the development of a Risk report improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
30. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
31. Is special Risk report user knowledge required?
<--- Score
32. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
33. How does the Risk report manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
34. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
35. When is/was the Risk report start date?
<--- Score
36. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk report results?
<--- Score
37. Will team members perform Risk report work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
38. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
39. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
40. Who approved the Risk report scope?
<--- Score
41. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
42. What are the Risk report use cases?
<--- Score
43. Is there a clear Risk report case definition?
<--- Score
44. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
45. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
46. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope of the Risk report work?
<--- Score
48. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
49. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
50. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
51. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk report work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
52. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
53. Is Risk report currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
54. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
55. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
56. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
57. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
58. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
59. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
60. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
61. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
62. How do you think the partners involved in Risk report would have defined success?
<--- Score
63. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
64. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
65. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
66. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
67. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
68. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
69. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Risk report?
<--- Score
70. Has a Risk report requirement not been met?
<--- Score
71. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk report study?
<--- Score
72. How do you hand over Risk report context?
<--- Score
