3.4 Decision Log: High Finance221
3.5 Quality Audit: High Finance223
3.6 Team Directory: High Finance226
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: High Finance228
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: High Finance230
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: High Finance232
3.10 Issue Log: High Finance234
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: High Finance236
4.1 Project Performance Report: High Finance238
4.2 Variance Analysis: High Finance240
4.3 Earned Value Status: High Finance242
4.4 Risk Audit: High Finance244
4.5 Contractor Status Report: High Finance246
4.6 Formal Acceptance: High Finance248
5.0 Closing Process Group: High Finance250
5.1 Procurement Audit: High Finance252
5.2 Contract Close-Out: High Finance254
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: High Finance256
5.4 Lessons Learned: High Finance258
Index260
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
2. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with High Finance?
<--- Score
3. Which information does the High Finance business case need to include?
<--- Score
4. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying High Finance research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
5. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
6. What vendors make products that address the High Finance needs?
<--- Score
7. Does your organization need more High Finance education?
<--- Score
8. What information do users need?
<--- Score
9. Who should resolve the High Finance issues?
<--- Score
10. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize High Finance as an effective investment?
<--- Score
11. What situation(s) led to this High Finance Self Assessment?
<--- Score
12. Consider your own High Finance project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
13. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
14. Is it needed?
<--- Score
15. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
16. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
17. What are the High Finance resources needed?
<--- Score
18. Does High Finance create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
19. What problems are you facing and how do you consider High Finance will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
20. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
21. What would happen if High Finance weren’t done?
<--- Score
22. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
23. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
24. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
27. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
28. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
29. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
30. Think about the people you identified for your High Finance project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
31. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
