criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
67. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
68. Is special High Finance user knowledge required?
<--- Score
69. Have all basic functions of High Finance been defined?
<--- Score
70. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
71. What sources do you use to gather information for a High Finance study?
<--- Score
72. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
73. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
74. What was the context?
<--- Score
75. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
76. How did the High Finance manager receive input to the development of a High Finance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
77. What system do you use for gathering High Finance information?
<--- Score
78. When is/was the High Finance start date?
<--- Score
79. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
80. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
81. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
82. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
83. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
84. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
85. Is there a clear High Finance case definition?
<--- Score
86. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
87. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
88. Is High Finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
89. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
90. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
91. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
92. What is in scope?
<--- Score
93. Who approved the High Finance scope?
<--- Score
94. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
95. What is the definition of High Finance excellence?
<--- Score
96. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
97. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
98. How do you hand over High Finance context?
<--- Score
99. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
100. What are the High Finance tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
101. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
102. Is the High Finance scope manageable?
<--- Score
103. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
104. Is there any additional High Finance definition of success?
<--- Score
105. What would be the goal or target for a High Finance’s improvement team?
<--- Score
106. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
107. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
108. What gets examined?
<--- Score
109. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
