Score
21. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
22. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
23. What is the scope?
<--- Score
24. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
25. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
26. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
27. What are the record-keeping requirements of High Finance activities?
<--- Score
28. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
29. What is the scope of the High Finance effort?
<--- Score
30. How do you think the partners involved in High Finance would have defined success?
<--- Score
31. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
32. Is High Finance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
33. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does High Finance leverage and how?
<--- Score
34. Who are the High Finance improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
35. Are accountability and ownership for High Finance clearly defined?
<--- Score
36. Why are you doing High Finance and what is the scope?
<--- Score
37. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
38. How are consistent High Finance definitions important?
<--- Score
39. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
40. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
41. Has the direction changed at all during the course of High Finance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
42. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
43. Do you all define High Finance in the same way?
<--- Score
44. Who is gathering High Finance information?
<--- Score
45. Is the scope of High Finance defined?
<--- Score
46. What High Finance services do you require?
<--- Score
47. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
48. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
49. Will team members perform High Finance work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
50. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
51. How have you defined all High Finance requirements first?
<--- Score
52. Do you have a High Finance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
53. Are the High Finance requirements testable?
<--- Score
54. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
55. Are the High Finance requirements complete?
<--- Score
56. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
57. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
58. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
59. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to High Finance changes?
<--- Score
60. What are the core elements of the High Finance business case?
<--- Score
61. How do you catch High Finance definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
62. Will team members regularly document their High Finance work?
<--- Score
63. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform High Finance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
64. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
65. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
66. Do the problem and goal statements
