Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
7. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
8. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental health action plan work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
9. Who are the Environmental health action plan improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
10. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental health action plan brings?
<--- Score
11. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
12. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
13. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
14. Who is gathering Environmental health action plan information?
<--- Score
15. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
16. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
17. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
18. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
19. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
20. How would you define Environmental health action plan leadership?
<--- Score
21. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
22. What gets examined?
<--- Score
23. How can the value of Environmental health action plan be defined?
<--- Score
24. How are consistent Environmental health action plan definitions important?
<--- Score
25. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
26. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
27. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
28. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
29. What is the context?
<--- Score
30. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
31. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
32. How will the Environmental health action plan team and the group measure complete success of Environmental health action plan?
<--- Score
33. How do you gather Environmental health action plan requirements?
<--- Score
34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
35. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
36. What system do you use for gathering Environmental health action plan information?
<--- Score
37. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
38. What happens if Environmental health action plan’s scope changes?
<--- Score
39. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
40. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental health action plan goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
41. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
42. Will a Environmental health action plan production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
43. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
44. How have you defined all Environmental health action plan requirements first?
<--- Score
45. Is the Environmental health action plan scope manageable?
<--- Score
46. How do you manage unclear Environmental health action plan requirements?
<--- Score
47. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
48. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
49. What is the scope of Environmental health action plan?
<---
