Score
50. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
51. Are the Environmental health action plan requirements complete?
<--- Score
52. What are the Environmental health action plan use cases?
<--- Score
53. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
54. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
55. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
56. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
58. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
59. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
60. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
61. Who approved the Environmental health action plan scope?
<--- Score
62. How did the Environmental health action plan manager receive input to the development of a Environmental health action plan improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
63. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
64. What are the core elements of the Environmental health action plan business case?
<--- Score
65. Is Environmental health action plan linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
66. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
67. Is the Environmental health action plan scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
68. Do you all define Environmental health action plan in the same way?
<--- Score
69. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
71. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
72. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental health action plan’s improvement team?
<--- Score
73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
74. Is there any additional Environmental health action plan definition of success?
<--- Score
75. Has the Environmental health action plan work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
76. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
77. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
78. What Environmental health action plan services do you require?
<--- Score
79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope?
<--- Score
81. What Environmental health action plan requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of the Environmental health action plan work?
<--- Score
83. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
84. Is special Environmental health action plan user knowledge required?
<--- Score
85. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
87. What is in scope?
<--- Score
88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
89. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
90. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
91. What was the context?
<--- Score
92. What sort of initial information to gather?
<---
